Even without capitalism, some people still need more help than others, which is what equity is about no?

Can someone fill me in on this. To my knowledge social equity (which is what I presume we are talking about) is basically just equality of outcome, right? Equality is a huge umbrella term (in philosophy of ethics, economics, political philosophy, etc) anyway. But equality of outcome is a lot less capitalist than equality of opportunity, so I would think that social equity would be favorable. But I don't really know where the term even comes from and what nuance and connotations it holds.

If you do that, people are gonna get hit by baseballs. Build a chain link fence people can see through.

Yeah, that is a fair point.