you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

From the emacs-devel mailing list (Archive). Was about to post this myself. The world deserves such a better free software movement than the one these guys have built.

I hope the Human Emacs fork goes ahead, because I love Emacs too much to give it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 53 minutes ago

    I understand the overall argument. I'm not 100% sure of how well this argument fits with not doing anything about LLM contributions, but OK. You don't want to add too many goals to your already established group or that could easily create fracturing between its members. If everyone sticks to a single goal, old members won't complain about the group changing direction in ways they don't agree with, the group might bring more people in (because anyone that agrees with that single goal might want to contribute), and the resources won't be spread thin.

    Claiming to accept contributions that result from slavery is way fucking beyond that though. I don't know about you, but I'd expect that every group I work with would at the very fucking least agree to follow the goddamn Universal Declaration of Human Rights. And in the GNU Foundation's particular case, I'd also expect them to do it, especially with them having being founded is the US, the country where the UN is headquartered.

    Also, is it just me, or do the GNU Foundation's leaders keep forgetting how to be human? This is far from the first time they've said stupid stuff like this.

  • source
  • parent