you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Amusing that you think I'm blind. Neither El-Sayed nor any of the new progressives can effectively be Speaker because they have not been in the Senate. You have to have spent at least some amount of time in the chamber to do the job. It's not for beginners, and I never said it was.

And I also note that you have entirely ignored -- again -- the most salient points of all, which are the reasons WHY Schumer should not continue as Senate leader.

In the new Senate there are 57 Democratic senators, plus or minus, to choose from, along with an absolute wealth of collected wisdom there to help whoever is chosen, and the plain fact of the matter is that people get replaced all the time. Even politicians. And the world goes on, for better or for worse.

But it WILL NOT be Schumer if we are to have change.

From earlier this year:

“I have many jobs as [Senate] leader... and one is to fight for aid to Israel — all the aid that Israel needs,” Schumer said

“I will continue to fight for it,” Schumer continued. “We delivered more security assistance to Israel, our ally, than ever, ever before.”

The US now has $40 TRILLION in debt and this motherfucker wants to continue to bleed us dry.

Tell you what. YOU, personally, can whip out your wallet, scrape everything you have out of it, send it to some Israeli defense fund, and rest easy in the knowledge that your own cash will be used to fund genocide.

I want no part of it. Stop coming at me with your willfully ignorant bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 11 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 11 hours ago*

    No. It really wasn't.

    There will not be a second Chuck Schumer: whoever gets selected will be his or her own self, with their own strengths and weaknesses. But that person will be the choice of their party, and have the help of those there -- including Schumer himself to help, if he is even a fraction of the citizen you think he is.

    You elided past all the rest of what I wrote, so I came to the point: there are others who can do the job. I can't name them, because it has to be someone the Senate likes personally and can get the votes, as well as who knows the Senate and the senators: all of this is something a noob can't do. But even LBJ had to start somewhere.

    My guess is that you are getting caught in the details as you write, but what you may not realize is that you are coming across as incredibly insulting. Those of us downvoting you are neither ignorant nor blind, for myself I'm probably three times older than you (at minimum), and it doesn't take much to understand the basics of what a Senate Majority Leader does. But you don't credit anyone else with even that much.

    Meanwhile, a Senate Majority Leader can block as much legislation as he allows, and Schumer has done so in favor of Israel.

    TL;DR: Better a lesser politician with full allegiance to his own country and people, than the best political operative with an allegiance to billionaires and Israel.

  • source
  • parent