So killing is not okay except when its internet-approved vigilantism?

Example: "Polititian commutes death sentences" Lemmy be like "good", but then when "Politician condemns assassination" Lemmy have a problem with condeming political violence?

(Like Gavin Newsom commutes all death row immates in California vs when Democratic polititians condemned Luigi Mangione)

Or are these different groups of Lemmings?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 15 hours ago

i was confused for quite a bit until i realized Pat Robertson was an actual person and not some placeholder name with a ring to it lol

by the c.f. part i meant the moral prohibition loses its power because, in the ideal world created by your conditions of which one is right, there would be no repercussions for violation. as seen in what i'm c.f.-ing against, this has a significant chance of leading to a world where some people go out to hunt and kill those whose deaths they think make the world objectively less hateful.

  • source
  • parent