368
Kidnapped Teenager Rescued After Reaching Out For Help In Among Us - The 17-year-old victim was rescued after contacting a player they met in Among Us, over 500 days after they were kidnapped (kotaku.com)
submitted 2 days ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
150 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I'm not making any assumptions, though you are since you didn't read the article (this was someone the met in Among Us), and you are assuming I'm victim blaming (could he some off-the-wall coercion). I know nothing of the situation, or the child, but 500 days as a 16/17 year old is not a normal kidnapping. I.E. something does not add up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I know nothing of the situation, or the child, but 500 days as a 16/17 year old is not a normal kidnapping. I.E. something does not add up.

    We're obviously not talking about "kidnap and ransom" case here. We're talking about someone being sex trafficked. They were not holding that girl for money.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    No, we're not, this is you assuming again. The article states a single abuser, and has kidnapping in the title, thus my description. Please just read the article.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I did read the article. I also have common sense. This clearly seems like a man abducted a girl to use as his sex slave. Kidnapping does not imply a ransom. No ransom was mentioned. And really, in 2026, one person is not going to be able to pull off a kidnapping and ransom. There's a reason they almost never happen anymore; there's just too many ways for the kidnapper to get caught in the process of contacting the victim's family and actually collecting the ransom. Today, kidnapping and ransom only really happens in places around the world where the police are in full cooperation with the gangs, like in cartel-held regions of Mexico.

    The reason the situation seems odd to you is that you're fixated on this being a kidnapping and ransom. This was a case of sex trafficking. It's the only explanation that matches the fact pattern:

    • 500 days in captivity.
    • No mention of any ransom or police manhunt.
    • A single individual apparently responsible for the whole thing.
    • The use of the word "predator" in the article.
    • The mention of her abuse over the months in captivity.

    The most likely explanation is a man kidnapping a girl to keep her as a sex slave in his basement. If there were any ransom attempt, there would have been a huge manhunt, and it would have been a huge media circus. You don't think we would have heard about a 16 year old (likely) white girl being kidnapped and ransomed? The media lives for that shit.

    This was just derived from the article and common sense. But I went ahead and did some more searching. There are other articles out there with more information. For example, this one.

    Adam Hunter Harmel faces a federal count of transportation with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity following his arrest in eastern Oregon

    Sounds like sex slavery to me.

    The affidavit details severe physical and sexual abuse throughout the girl's confinement. Harmel allegedly slept in the same basement bed as the teenager, keeping a knife beneath his pillow and forcing her to sleep against the wall to prevent her escape. Authorities said Harmel repeatedly assaulted and struck the girl, expressed a desire to start a family, and forced her to remove her orthodontic braces using pliers so she could not be identified.

    Yeah. She was trafficked. A monster abducted her, held her in his basement, and tried to force her to be his "wife." He's literally being charged with both kidnapping and sexual abuse. Have a little more common sense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I did read the article, but unlike you I have reading comprehension.

    More recently, Harmel gave the victim a new phone without cellular data. However, the teenager was able to connect to Wi-Fi via the phone and used it to access the online game Among Us. The victim then seemingly used Among Us’ in-game chat function to contact another teenager in a lobby. The two exchanged social media details.

    She contacted them in a lobby. It does not state that is where they met. They used the lobby chat to talk and exchange social media handles. She likely had to make new ones on this new phone to use. Nowhere does it state they did not know eachother before, but the fact that the teenager was able to contact her mother, as the article also states, implies to me that they had some sort of connection to her prior to the kidnapping. Perhaps I am wrong about that but nowhere does the article say otherwise.

    You are very much crashing out right now btw. You don't seem to even realize that @isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone is not me. And your reaction to me saying not to assume a kid in this situation would react logically is to get offended that I'm accusing you of "victim blaming". When all I'm doing is pointing out that kids don't always do things the way we might expect since they don't have the life experience we do.

    Take a breath.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •