75
JetBrains working on higher-abstraction programming language (www.infoworld.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So another 4th generation language that no one uses. Great.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's a long list of words I have never heard of. I do like how SQL somehow fits the bill of a 4GL.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It makes sense, you aren't telling sql server how to do something, you just tell it what you want and it figures it out. You aren't even doing procedural stuff at that point.

    I like the RAD tools being qualified as 4GLs as I haven't really thought of them that way but again it makes sense.

    Also screw PowerBuilder. I am sorry if anyone in this thread likes it...but it is seriously awful.

    Edit: Before people jump me, I do know that you have some influence over execution plans with join orders, hints, etc.. but by and large you don't tell SQL Server how to do it's job.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •