you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -13 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Its how the media works my dude. They're mostly owned by fatcat billionaires. Its largely probably not even about clicks at this point as it is about finding groups to "other" your viewers/readers into being afraid of.

    If people started hearing about how the largest demographics are going insane because rich people want more money then even the really racist people might start asking questions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Maybe the reason that the news outlets are not chasing the reason for this crime is because of the race or religion of the man in question. Intra-race crimes get less clicks therefore less coverage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Inter-race crimes = more coverage = more investigative work as to motive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's not what he's saying nor what happened here.

    What happened is someone speculated it was a white Christian man.

    That's not reason. That's rascism. Just because it's against whites doesn't mean it's not racism.

    No person should be profiles because of their skin color. no one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can see that mentioning race, in a reply to commit about motive was wrong. I was speaking to coverage of crime through the prism of race rather than motive. I did not intend link motive to race but I can see that it is logical interpretation but was not my intention. Apologies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment