you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 days ago* (5 children)

Exactly, how do we ban a word that we just made up?

We have LLMs, SI doesn't exist, they are not even AI.

LLMs run a wide spectrum of types and capabilities already and most people don't even know the basics, but none of them are SI/AI.

Should be ban local open models? (They can do "forbidden things" like copy software. They also do a ton of useful stuff, cheaply.)

How about only government and corporate approved models with guardrails? (Think what they tell you, and sell your data? Pay forever!).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago* (4 children)

    Should be ban local open models?

    what part of fuck ai didn't you understand when you walked in here?

    How about only government and corporate approved models with guardrails?

    No. How about not building jack SHIT on stolen data? how about not driving up the costs of ram, cpus, storage, water, power, fucking everything?

    FUCK AI. even your cutesy AI-lite flavours

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    This sounds like "ban the Internet" in 1995.

    Sure push back against the hyper scalers, spread the warnings of social change (it's going to happen, we couldn't stop spam, and shortened attention spans either), but reactionary bans and hyperbolic name calling will only help the tech influencers fearmonger in their own legislation that benefits them not the people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] -4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    The all caps were a nice value add.

    Well, no point having a discussion with fanatics. Enjoy fighting the steam engine John Henry. Meanwhile, some of us will at least try to make sure the benefits of the new tech go to the people and not the top 1% while you scream at the sky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)