you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Perfect so we agree they're not the same terms then regardless of your dramatic starter language.

Also no one said it was, I specifically said they're not the same thing and yes indeed agi is what most companies are after when they say ai.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

    yes indeed agi is what most companies are after when they say ai.

    In the past, yes. Right now? No. The current models are not attempting to create AGI. They're trying to create a product they can market easily. Honestly, AGI probably would have marketing issues that the current models do not have. The current models are essentially statistical prediction models, not intelligence. They don't reason (despite the industry using that term for marketing). They can't understand something that is totally outside their training data. AGI could.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 hours ago

    It's a bit silly to say they don't reason.

    Here's some research where they uncover reasoning circuits in some large transformer models https://github.com/guanzhehong/prop-logic-transformer-circuit ... reasoning has always been just math at th end of the day

    And what about alpha go and all that monte carlo tree search stuff, id argue that they can reason far better than humans in these setups

    They can't understand something...outside their training data

    Idk how easy this is for the the large models, but certainly for classic ML, testing for performance on data outside the training data is 100% part of the development process. (Read up on test/train/validation datasets)

    There is also in context learning, which gives rise to zero shot task completion for never trained on tasks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

    Right now yes. They're attempting to create the architecture to build an agi. You're being tedious at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

    The current industry? No, they aren't. Academia? Maybe. The current industry is not out to do something like that. They're thinking about how they can get more investor money next quarter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago (2 children)

    Adorable. What are they aiming for exactly? Be specific.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child)

    I already said. Whatever makes the most money next quarter. It's not some amazing end goal they're working towards. It's whatever they con convince investors to put money into. Almost always the marketing is not about AGI. The marketing is how they're going to replace workers. You don't need AGI for this.

    It's adorable that you think it's something more intelligent than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment