▲ 59 ▼ Democrats now have a majority in Congress, but we can’t forget that they’ve held it before, and our lives only got harder. All they want from us is a vote, then silence until the next election. (tankie.tube) submitted 2 days ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Godric@lemmy.world -6 points 1 day ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] EmmiLime@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago You are a child. Knee-jerk reaction to everything that that doesn't align to your views, no introspection and absolutely no sign of object permanence. And if you deadass think mass-murdering repressive dictatorship is the solution, oh bud, you are too far gone XD Thinking China is like this while completely rooting for the genocide-enabling Democrats lol okay you little baby. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children) You did not answer my question. Let me ask in the form of metaphor, that might help. Do you believe capitalism is a sinking ship, where progressives can only patch holes to slow it sinking, or do you believe capitalism is a ship that is off-course, and that progressives can steer it towards the right direction? Which is it? I believe the former, but it's unclear if you believe the latter. As for China, it's a democratic country run by popular councils that ladder upwards. For how this works in detail, as well as an overview of how socialist democracy has evolved over time and the reasons why, I recommend Socialism in Power: On the History and Theory of Socialist Governance by professor Roland Boer. Who is it that China is mass-murdering, by the way? I'm genuinely trying to come to an understanding with your thought process. I don't think we will agree, but I think we can find common ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Godric@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EmmiLime@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago Off course, and China absolutely is not a “democratic country”. Would you also cite a Russia Today article as evidence Russia is a democracy? You're literally not even engaging with what Cowbee is saying and all you do instead is have a racist knee-jerk reaction at the thought of China. Typical shitlib who refuses to read. Read a book for fuck's sake. Read a book that isn't Harry Potter or 1984 lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago Alright, thanks for answering the first bit! I'll address it first, as it's foundational to the split in out analysis. I'll list a few things I believe to be true, and you can explain which you disagree with and why. I'm not forcing you or cornering you into this, you don't have to participate if you don't want to, but this will get to the meat of your disagreement with Marxists, and our disagreement with you. Markets historically have a tendency towards monopoly and centralization. Bigger firms not only have the advantage of having more resources, but production eventually requires larger scales as the economy itself grows, ie to bust a monopoly, rather than nationalizing it, is to set productive capacity backwards. Monopoly, under capitalism, turns to enshittification, so to speak. These are 3 basic beliefs I have, and they all combine into the belief that capitalism cannot last forever, and therefore markets outlast their progressive nature in stitching together production as they scale. This means planned economy is more efficient at this point. If you disagree with any of these, I'd love to hear how and why. Genuinely. As for China and being a democracy, why do you say that it isn't? Where did your understanding of China's democratic institutions and government structures come from? Roland Boer may be a professor living in China, but his work is academic and trusted even by westerners trying to understand China. I didn't just link a document saying "we're democratic!" I linked a textbook that describes in-detail how and why China's institutions function the way they do. You can make up for yourself if you believe these institutions are sufficiently democratic, but they factually do work the way described in the textbook. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] EmmiLime@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago You are a child. Knee-jerk reaction to everything that that doesn't align to your views, no introspection and absolutely no sign of object permanence. And if you deadass think mass-murdering repressive dictatorship is the solution, oh bud, you are too far gone XD Thinking China is like this while completely rooting for the genocide-enabling Democrats lol okay you little baby. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children) You did not answer my question. Let me ask in the form of metaphor, that might help. Do you believe capitalism is a sinking ship, where progressives can only patch holes to slow it sinking, or do you believe capitalism is a ship that is off-course, and that progressives can steer it towards the right direction? Which is it? I believe the former, but it's unclear if you believe the latter. As for China, it's a democratic country run by popular councils that ladder upwards. For how this works in detail, as well as an overview of how socialist democracy has evolved over time and the reasons why, I recommend Socialism in Power: On the History and Theory of Socialist Governance by professor Roland Boer. Who is it that China is mass-murdering, by the way? I'm genuinely trying to come to an understanding with your thought process. I don't think we will agree, but I think we can find common ground. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Godric@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EmmiLime@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago Off course, and China absolutely is not a “democratic country”. Would you also cite a Russia Today article as evidence Russia is a democracy? You're literally not even engaging with what Cowbee is saying and all you do instead is have a racist knee-jerk reaction at the thought of China. Typical shitlib who refuses to read. Read a book for fuck's sake. Read a book that isn't Harry Potter or 1984 lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago Alright, thanks for answering the first bit! I'll address it first, as it's foundational to the split in out analysis. I'll list a few things I believe to be true, and you can explain which you disagree with and why. I'm not forcing you or cornering you into this, you don't have to participate if you don't want to, but this will get to the meat of your disagreement with Marxists, and our disagreement with you. Markets historically have a tendency towards monopoly and centralization. Bigger firms not only have the advantage of having more resources, but production eventually requires larger scales as the economy itself grows, ie to bust a monopoly, rather than nationalizing it, is to set productive capacity backwards. Monopoly, under capitalism, turns to enshittification, so to speak. These are 3 basic beliefs I have, and they all combine into the belief that capitalism cannot last forever, and therefore markets outlast their progressive nature in stitching together production as they scale. This means planned economy is more efficient at this point. If you disagree with any of these, I'd love to hear how and why. Genuinely. As for China and being a democracy, why do you say that it isn't? Where did your understanding of China's democratic institutions and government structures come from? Roland Boer may be a professor living in China, but his work is academic and trusted even by westerners trying to understand China. I didn't just link a document saying "we're democratic!" I linked a textbook that describes in-detail how and why China's institutions function the way they do. You can make up for yourself if you believe these institutions are sufficiently democratic, but they factually do work the way described in the textbook. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Godric@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EmmiLime@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago Off course, and China absolutely is not a “democratic country”. Would you also cite a Russia Today article as evidence Russia is a democracy? You're literally not even engaging with what Cowbee is saying and all you do instead is have a racist knee-jerk reaction at the thought of China. Typical shitlib who refuses to read. Read a book for fuck's sake. Read a book that isn't Harry Potter or 1984 lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago Alright, thanks for answering the first bit! I'll address it first, as it's foundational to the split in out analysis. I'll list a few things I believe to be true, and you can explain which you disagree with and why. I'm not forcing you or cornering you into this, you don't have to participate if you don't want to, but this will get to the meat of your disagreement with Marxists, and our disagreement with you. Markets historically have a tendency towards monopoly and centralization. Bigger firms not only have the advantage of having more resources, but production eventually requires larger scales as the economy itself grows, ie to bust a monopoly, rather than nationalizing it, is to set productive capacity backwards. Monopoly, under capitalism, turns to enshittification, so to speak. These are 3 basic beliefs I have, and they all combine into the belief that capitalism cannot last forever, and therefore markets outlast their progressive nature in stitching together production as they scale. This means planned economy is more efficient at this point. If you disagree with any of these, I'd love to hear how and why. Genuinely. As for China and being a democracy, why do you say that it isn't? Where did your understanding of China's democratic institutions and government structures come from? Roland Boer may be a professor living in China, but his work is academic and trusted even by westerners trying to understand China. I didn't just link a document saying "we're democratic!" I linked a textbook that describes in-detail how and why China's institutions function the way they do. You can make up for yourself if you believe these institutions are sufficiently democratic, but they factually do work the way described in the textbook. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EmmiLime@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago Off course, and China absolutely is not a “democratic country”. Would you also cite a Russia Today article as evidence Russia is a democracy? You're literally not even engaging with what Cowbee is saying and all you do instead is have a racist knee-jerk reaction at the thought of China. Typical shitlib who refuses to read. Read a book for fuck's sake. Read a book that isn't Harry Potter or 1984 lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago Alright, thanks for answering the first bit! I'll address it first, as it's foundational to the split in out analysis. I'll list a few things I believe to be true, and you can explain which you disagree with and why. I'm not forcing you or cornering you into this, you don't have to participate if you don't want to, but this will get to the meat of your disagreement with Marxists, and our disagreement with you. Markets historically have a tendency towards monopoly and centralization. Bigger firms not only have the advantage of having more resources, but production eventually requires larger scales as the economy itself grows, ie to bust a monopoly, rather than nationalizing it, is to set productive capacity backwards. Monopoly, under capitalism, turns to enshittification, so to speak. These are 3 basic beliefs I have, and they all combine into the belief that capitalism cannot last forever, and therefore markets outlast their progressive nature in stitching together production as they scale. This means planned economy is more efficient at this point. If you disagree with any of these, I'd love to hear how and why. Genuinely. As for China and being a democracy, why do you say that it isn't? Where did your understanding of China's democratic institutions and government structures come from? Roland Boer may be a professor living in China, but his work is academic and trusted even by westerners trying to understand China. I didn't just link a document saying "we're democratic!" I linked a textbook that describes in-detail how and why China's institutions function the way they do. You can make up for yourself if you believe these institutions are sufficiently democratic, but they factually do work the way described in the textbook. permalink fedilink source parent