Fwiw I love that you gave me an actual response. And I really like this. The one point in my post I thought was strongest is the wild animal case - there is probably suffering from the victim, but there's no exploitation, a wild animal doesn't have any concept of that and therefore cannot be exploiting (there might be an exception but I don't think we need to go there)
You gave a clean answer without even crossing over into what is "morally" correct which gives such a strong foundation for veganism philosophically speaking.