New title: ADF gets to play with American toys, while they don't need them.

Seriously, if this doesn't result in full control of production and independent use, then these things are useless to be included in defence plans of Australia.

We'd be better off without them, knowing we absolutley don't have the capability, instead of having the possibility of the rug pulled, like what has happened to Ukraine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    But that is the height of foolishness. Once a partner proves it can be unreliable, then it must influence our decisions regards that partner.

    To double down on that partner is crazy. One person doesn't make policy, Trump least of all, he spends all his time chasing the latest shiny object that distracts from his theft and corruption.

    There are many senior officials in that country that take client status for the ADF as a given, after Ukraine that is no longer a position the US can be trusted to hold.

    Its probably also true that a large part of the US would probably like a disentanglement from their allies as well, they have foolish reasons, America First, etc.. but that is something that makes Australua's pragmatic decisions all the more important to get right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    We shouldn't rely on nations willing to commit genocide for anything. Therefore Israel is a non-starter, and must be treated with caution and distance from here on in all levels of engagement.

    A concentration on domestic, or near neighbour manufacturing should be our focus. The European powers are probably more reliable in terms of not letting sudden political values changes, shred their military alliances, but their ability to supply a nation on the other side of the world limits the extent we can rely on such partnerships.

    In other words, we can rely on New Zealand absolutely, then other nations to much lesser degrees than we have been, in terms of maintaining a secure logistical supply of our essential ADF technology. This means I do think we have to completely re-engineer our defense force, and community expectations around what our military is capable of delivering.

    Our military has been artificially propped up to a more capable technology level than our country has prepared to be able to maintain, in a world where might makes right, that means our sovereignty is beholden to the whims of our senior suppliers. I'd like more independence of manoeuvre than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    If you want the best from 'allies' then the US should have been the partner of choice in most of that little list.

    Your thoughts on Israel are tiring, a refusal to see a genocide when it is happening in front of you is sad. I hope one day you'll recognise the ridiculousness of your equivalences with their far less powerful neighbours. Even if you could prove a genocide against Israel by those neighbours (which cant be done), one genocide doesn't absolve another genocide. A crime against humanity stands as a black mark against those who sink to those levels of depravity.

    The reason NZ is the partner of choice, is because they are the only nation we can rely on. I alluded to this earlier, my view is we should accept less influence, but be more able to protect ourselves. Essentially we have become too reliant on the alliance structure as a means of securing our power and prosperity, to a fault. I advocate a paring back of this reliance, which inherently means a trade off of international power, but means we will be a more reliable partner, and not a subject, in a conflict.

    Edit: less of a subject

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Ah yes, it's the israeli's fault they don't subscribe to a backwards religion, treat their women like cattle, and spend most of their time praying to a god that doesn't exist instead of working to improve diplomatic relations and business capacity of their own countries.

    Thats just weird to call a country founded on a religion thats older than Islam, and quite closely related in many ways not backwards, if Islam is a backwards religion then the same can be said of Judaism and Christianity.

    Most of what you said there can just as easily be laid at Israel's feet. Sans treat their women like cattle, but they treat other humans, like arab Israelis, or Gazans, or west bankers like cattle, so they aren't any better, they just target different groups.

    But I don't blame these peoples religions for any of their immoral behaviours, its not the religion that makes a crap human, its their lack of empathy and morals to those they deem as other to their own.

    As far as improving diplomatic relations, and improving business capacity Israel should also listen to that advice. Their actions since October 7th have vanished all semblance of a 'most moral army' concept. Their actions before Oct 7th were already leading to hard questions about colonialism. They've materially hurt their international business prospects to a level akin to coal companies, this effects things like borrrowing capacity, complicates expansion and mergers in a less friendly world, they are costs that must be borne. Of course their great benefactor, USA, will ease this pain a great deal but even they can only do so much.

    Take these much vaunted Abraham Accords, the autocrat MBS is now in a position where to proceed with them could destabilize their piece of shit regime due to the ill feeling in Arab nations about the treatment of Gazans. So if international diplomacy and business relations were really that important here, Israel again is just as bad as the rest.

    Take their judicial system, it has been undermined by its executive branch time and again, making a mockery of a 'rule of law', something pretty essential to inspire business investment. Not to mention the lack of justice the aforementioned Arab-Israelis, and Palestinians recieve.

    Their key difference, it seems, is again they have the force of the worlds largest military, and possibly largest economy full square behind them, allowing Israel to defy gravity. But lets not believe they are any better, its long since past that those arguments could be made.

    I'll have a read of the South Korea contract piece, looks interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've never claimed the other side are full of lovely people, thats not point. There you go again with your equivalences. Let me explain, when one person murders a brother and that victim's brother then goes and murders the original murderers brother, two crimes have been committed, and each murderer is answerable for their crimes. You ikplicitly advocate eye for an eye with your tacit support of Israels actions. Eye for an eye simply leads to ongoing feuds, as we see a lot of with Israel and their neighbours, time for a different approach.

    You're a massive fan of Israel obviously, but try looking at the experience from the other side. The crimes they've committed aren't forgotten, theres a long history there, and it doesn't do anyone well to ignore one side in favour of the other. The colonial take over of that land, the ongoing persecution of the people i've already mentioned isn't absolved because they've had crimes committed against them. Its perplexing that i have to restate this.

    My point about NZ is they're the only country we can rely on to a high degree, not whatever you think i said about their miltary and technological capability. I've said this a couple different ways now.

    I think the disconnect is your impressed and argue that we should cleave to powerful allies, whereas i'm impressed and argue that we should cleave to those willing to uphold some semblance of moral values. Until we both realise we aren't valuing the same things here, we won't be able to see the others point of view.

    All you said about Israel's economy was a bit wasted, i actually accounted for that and didn't dismiss it. But to ignore the fact their close relationship and support from the United States, and European countries like Britain and France and their efforts in building up that place as an 'unsinkable aircraft carrier' misses the point of why their economy is so 'blessed'. I find it incredible you would ignore that. There are few economies that can sustainably pull themselves up without massive support from benefactors, Israel isn't incredible, its a natural outcome of continued unquestioning investment and support. My point is, thats been put at risk, and made harder since their behaviour since Oct 7th, and now they aren't materially different from their neighbours in that regard.

    Left wing progressives don't tend to let go of things. They've been on this train for a long time. I generally find its good to listen to those people, they aren't shunted off on a different tangent like the rest of society so easily is. Thats my experience with left wing progresssives, maybe we've had different interactions there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • All you and I have said in essence doesn't matter.

    Their problem is the crimes they are committing in Gaza now. They could be the most enlightened unicorns the world has seen, they are still committing the heinous crime of starvation and mass punishment, and about a third of their 'enemy' seem to be children, you don't wipe your hands of this, and we don't let them.

    Israel doesn't have values like our own, maybe at some point the two countries were more aligned in that respect. Our history is sordid, and we continue to have problems and always will. We are changing as a nation, slowly, but i live in a very different country, and better, than i grew up in.

    We don't have to choose a best mate in the middle east, thats okay, i never tried to say any were better. We're a world away and can afford to keep all at arms length, thats a choice we can make.

    So i think the equivalences you draw aren't useful. Israel is a nation committing crimes against humanity, compare their actions against UN conventions, or the Rome Statute, etc..

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)