I posted this thread, without issues. A year later, I finally got a really insightful reply that wholly answered my question well:

https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/39819472/25666072

Now it is “Removed by mod”. But I am the mod.. the only mod (wtf?). No, I do not have multiple personality disorder as the modlog shows.

So somewhere, someone booted that user. That had a ripple effect of destroying all that user’s content. So then I found a “restore content” button, used it, and had to give a reason. I thought I would just be sending myself a useless alert, but it actually restored the content.

So it’s fixed to some extent. But I would like to understand more about what happened. I cannot tell from that user’s modlog who banned them, or even which instance did the banishment. It may be true that it was an anti-spam control, and perhaps rightful, but it’s a bit fucked up how it killed all that user’s content when obviously some of it was useful.

I have seen this before in communities I moderate where a comment is gone because a user is banned. I never looked further. But now it’S clear this is not optimum. It was only in the case at hand that a user’s comment was useful enough that I remembered it, and it happened to be recent.

Clearly this is a bug: I am given the option to “restore comment” but I cannot review the comment before clicking that. So how can I first give a reason for restoring the comment if I am restoring it just to see if it should be restored?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 6 days ago (1 child)

Since you didn't share the username/instance, we'll just have to guess since we can't look at the modlog but I would say that an instance admin got overzealous with the ban and remove all feature. I will admit that I did this one time when I shouldn't have and spent hours restoring years worth of their content when I realized what I had done.

I wouldn't say it's a bug but it is very easy for an admin to use incorrectly or withoutout care for the ramifications. It would make some sense to have a threshold time limiit as default so say "remove all content in the last day/week/month" or the admin can remove all in the event it's necessary.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

    Since you didn’t share the username/instance,

    Doesn’t this link work for you?

    https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/39819472/25666072

    AFAIK, SDF is open access. From there, you click … to reach that user’s modlog, which leads you here: https://lemmy.sdf.org/modlog?userId=27699421

    I wouldn’t say it’s a bug

    I’m calling it 5 bugs.

    but it is very easy for an admin to use incorrectly or withoutout care for the ramifications.

    It’s the job of the software to make the user understand what the software does.

  • source
  • parent