▲ 64 ▼ Final Benchmarks Of Clear Linux On Intel: ~48% Faster Than Ubuntu Out-Of-The-Box (www.phoronix.com) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev 8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] million@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (5 children) What is clear doing that is unique and what are the trade offs? Why isn’t this mainstreamed into other distros? permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) Clear Linux was maintained by Intel and specifically tuned to Intel hardware. The speed enhancement it has over other distros is only possible on a very limited set of hardware. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Do you know where I can find a list of that hardware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago https://www.clearlinux.org/clear-linux-documentation/reference/compatible-hardware.html Sorry about the delay. permalink fedilink source parent [–] million@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Interesting - is that kernel level thing? Could other distros use that on the right hardware or is too much to maintain multiple kernels that are that hardware specific? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Oinks@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago The mentioned performance governor runs the CPU permanently at maximum frequency, which is obviously bad on battery powered devices and on devices with lacking thermal headroom. I think it might cause problems in virtualized environments as well but I'm not sure about that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) Clear Linux was maintained by Intel and specifically tuned to Intel hardware. The speed enhancement it has over other distros is only possible on a very limited set of hardware. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Do you know where I can find a list of that hardware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago https://www.clearlinux.org/clear-linux-documentation/reference/compatible-hardware.html Sorry about the delay. permalink fedilink source parent [–] million@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Interesting - is that kernel level thing? Could other distros use that on the right hardware or is too much to maintain multiple kernels that are that hardware specific? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Do you know where I can find a list of that hardware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago https://www.clearlinux.org/clear-linux-documentation/reference/compatible-hardware.html Sorry about the delay. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago https://www.clearlinux.org/clear-linux-documentation/reference/compatible-hardware.html Sorry about the delay. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] million@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Interesting - is that kernel level thing? Could other distros use that on the right hardware or is too much to maintain multiple kernels that are that hardware specific? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Oinks@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago The mentioned performance governor runs the CPU permanently at maximum frequency, which is obviously bad on battery powered devices and on devices with lacking thermal headroom. I think it might cause problems in virtualized environments as well but I'm not sure about that. permalink fedilink source parent