884
qotd (lemmy.ca)
submitted 6 days ago by to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
74 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 6 days ago* (8 children)

I wonder who I believe more? A pro-LGBTQ site stating he's an ally or some rando who acts like a bad actor claiming he's not.

I think I'll stick to you're full of shit and I don't believe what you've said.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (7 children)

    Cute fallacy. Haven't seen Appeal to Authority from a leftist space in a little while

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago (6 children)

    Another play from the bad actor playbook. Keep going, continue proving you're a bad actor.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    Then tell me why a news outlet appealing to a demographic is more authoritative than a literal, actual person from the demographic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago* (4 children)

    Because if you had bothered to open that article you would've noticed they cite examples of why they come to that conclusion. You on the other hand have offered nothing except a single video (forgot to add, from the same authoritative site) you deliberately interpret in a way that suits your opinion. If nothing else you've proven you're clearly biased, they haven't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    So I’ve read all that, and all I can see is a man who has changed and abandoned us.

    “Trans people deserve dignity and equality, those are certainly principles and values that I still hold, and that stem directly from my faith.”

    Insulting us, and banning us from sports is exactly what he claimed to be against.

    When someone tells you who they are, you listen. Maybe he had a stroke, maybe he believes he can win if he sacrifices us, either way I cannot support it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (2 children)

    Insulting us, and banning us from sports is exactly what he claimed to be against.

    I keep seeing this being brought up and not a single time do I see anyone actually citing where he's done that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    My bad, looking into it he wasn’t one of the ones calling us “biological men” must be getting mixed up with Andrew’s or Kaptur who said that during the same week.

    “Every sport has to be safe and fair,” Talarico said on Fox News. “As a former public school teacher, I care a lot about our student athletes, I care a lot about our students. And so I will oppose trans athletes playing in girls’ sports if it risks safety or fairness.”

    “There are going to be rules where sometimes it’s not allowed. That’s actually how you solve a public policy problem with love for trans folks but also for our athletes, who need a fair shot at competition.”

    He does cede to bullshit transphobic talking points on sports however. Weasel words about safety or fairness don’t change the underlying message.

    Why couldn’t we still have the 2021 Talarico out there, instead of the more conservative 2026 model.

    “Some things are more important than perfectly fair competition in sports,” Talarico said in 2021.

    https://www.texastribune.org/2026/09/09/james-talarico-trans-sports-reversal-lgbtq-rights-texas-us-senate-race/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago

    Why couldn’t we still have the 2021 Talarico out there, instead of the more conservative 2026 model.

    I've already addressed this.

    Being openly pro-trans in a deeply anti-trans state means you’re not going to have any shot at doing anything good.

    And to go back to the root of this thread, what you're wanting is him to be the perfect candidate instead of a viable candidate. He can either be a perfect candidate and have no shot or give some concessions and have a shot to actually do something good.

    Also the concession in question isn't even that bad of a concession. You view it through the lens that only the first part of the sentence matters and the rest doesn't. If you look at it as a whole what he's actually saying is that he doesn't oppose trans athletes UNLESS someone proves it risks safety or fairness of the sport. From my point of view he's approaching the same issue from the perspective of the conservatives to get them to agree with him.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent