622
People living in Texas received this ad (programming.dev)
submitted 1 week ago by to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
removed 236 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Isn't the argument that god looks like a dude wearing an open robe and you can see his thick, veiny god-dong when he sits down casually?

If god doesn't have a thick, drippin' hog, what even is Christianity?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    I think I remember only one man (Job maybe) every was allowed to look on god a he could only see his back. That's probably because god lost the belt to his robe somewhere and knew that seeing the deitic phallus would just be too much for mortal man to handle.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Seems like a coincidence that Job could only see the back side of God. How did he get his name again?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •