you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

And it would take much longer to go back and re-find my weeks and months old sources, I don't see what makes so little sense about that. And that is not the standard of communication around here, which is the same standard you're adhering to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    And that is not the standard of communication around here, which is the same standard you’re adhering to.

    It should be.

    Why the fuck would anyone just believe you? You're just one person on the internet spreading lies about a political activist in an effort to discredit his messaging.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    You don't know how to search for and verify information on the internet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    You proved it for me already :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago

    Obviously I'd disagree. Between the two of us I would argue that I'm the only one who has brought even the slightest bit of verifiable evidence to support one of my claims.

    Correct me if I'm misremembering; but so far you only brought a single link that talks about Dan Saltman, which was entirely unrelated to my post or claims, which is what you've been aiming to refute.

    Not saying I'm drowning you in sources, but by my count 1 does beat 0 by a tiny bit.

  • source
  • parent