you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I was just using it as an example because a computer can replicate it exactly (its not oil on canvas, let's be honest, some things are different skills than others)

If it can replicate it perfectly it won't be spotted. I guarantee ai is used in every new (big name)movie today and people can't spot it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    You know a lot of art isn't digital, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Yes, but 98% of the world experiences art (music and visual) all digitally. Thats why it sucks so hard that bot slop poisoned everything.

    When did you last see a kid slap on a reel to reel? They dont even know what CDs are now (which are obv digital but at least physical).

    Unless youre going to hand made art shows and buying cassettes at local shows of bands. So that's what, 34 people out of 7 billion? 🫠

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    What a shit take. People interact with art way more in person than you're giving credit for. Plus there's entire art mediums that can't be experienced digitally. Ceramics, fiber arts, sewing, fireworks, cooking, just off the top of my head. Seeing a painting IRL is a very different experience than online. Reading a physical book even hits different.

    And again, the point isn't the end result. The point is making it. If people didn't want to make art there would be no craft supply stores, no one would buy instruments and learn to play, people wouldn't bother.

    Saying "oh we should give up" is ignoring that people want to make and decorate stuff.

  • source
  • parent