thingsiplay comments on Valve has ‘a significant number’ working on Steam’s visibility dilemma but says it won’t gatekeep games made with AI

PC Gaming

15,897 readers

5,932 active

733 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Sometimes this comes out and can be proven. Not always. It's still a risk. And yes, there will be liars out there, but at least there is a policy in place how to handle the situation.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

can be proven.

I don't believe it ever can be proven. It's simply hearsay - unless someone was recording the developers machine during development and then release a screen recording. Otherwise it's the developers word versus the accuser's, with Valve having to act as arbiter. You let me know if that ever happens, please, because I sincerely believe the scenario is an ant-AI pipe dream. A veneer of protection.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Never read the news where game devs got caught of using Ai, then suddenly they sorry and said it will never happen again, removing the content?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

Those were mistakes on the part of the developer. If they had never admitted it, then they never "got caught" since there's no way to prove the accusation.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Wrong. They got caught, and then the devs admitted, because they had no other choice. And yes, there are ways to proof it, but not in all cases. Otherwise they wouldn't get caught.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent