Seems like PJ used to post ~10 of these a day when he was active, so I figured I'd throw my hamster in the ring. 🙂

The First Schleswig War or Schleswig-Holstein uprising and the Three Years' War (Danish: Treårskrigen), was a military conflict in S. Denmark and N. Germany rooted in the Schleswig–Holstein question: who should control the duchies of Schleswig, Holstein and Lauenburg, which at the time were ruled by the king of Denmark in a personal union. Ultimately, Denmark proved victorious with the diplomatic support of the great powers, especially Britain and Russia, since the duchies were close to an important Baltic seaway connecting both powers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Schleswig_War

NOTE: there's a higher-quality 4298x3165 image at the link above.

Also fun to look at the assorted art here:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22First+Schleswig+War%22&udm=2


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/edVfP9XeOaI/maxresdefault.jpg

Finally, some comments via the EE:

It's exactly the kind of national romantic naïveté expressed by this painting that got Denmark into the Second Schleswig War, which was a disaster.

Lord Palmerston (British PM) apparently said "Only three people have ever really understood the Schleswig-Holstein business – the Prince Consort, who is dead – a German professor, who has gone mad – and I, who have forgotten all about it."

XD

Quick TL;DR of the Schleswig-Holstein Question?

So we have two duchies, Schleswig and Holstein. They are right next to each other and ruled by the same Duke, who also is the King of Denmark. Holstein is fully German, was part of the HRE and then the German Confederation. Schleswig has been Danish since the Viking Age but has a growing German population and is governed autonomous from Denmark. In the past Danish Kings signed treaties that the two duchies would remain forever undivided. In 1848 the Danish King tried to integrate Schleswig into Denmark proper. The Germans living there revolt and Holstein joins in.

Small correction. It was not the King's decision to integrate Schleswig. It was due to Denmark becoming a democracy and wanting to be a national state. The people in Schleswig did not want to be a part of the Danish national state and they did not want to be a minority inside a democracy. In fact in the beginning of the revolt, they thought that the king had been overthrown and they were prepared to fight as royalists(!)

As for the 'EE,' there are a few more interesting comments if you wish, but please put on your hazardous protective wear if one intends to visit them:

https://www.reddit.com/r/BattlePaintings/comments/1tmpu1r/danish_soldiers_returning_home_from_the_first/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Man with my uncle came back from Iraq with PTSD and IED injuries to overcome he could still smile. We still joked about stuff. He still took me and my cousins fishing. He could still have good times like a human being. He wasn't a broken fucking automaton of a human being like you're implying here. It's just a Bonkers offensive thing to say.

Also the Danish Prussian War was not exactly the most dire brutal war in the history of mankind here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    Yo, you and the other guy keep putting words in my mouth that I didn't say, not cool. I'm explaining why the other commentator asked what they asked, that's it. Nowhere have I said "if you have PTSD you can never smile again" that was your/his interpretation. If y'all don't know about the very well documented cases of soldiers with shell shock/thousand yard stare I don't know what to say, that's obviously what the other guy was referencing. I'm sorry if it surfaced personal experiences but I was just trying to be helpful, again nowhere did I say "PTSD means you can never be happy again" since that's obviously not true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    You know you might consider the fact that if multiple people interpret your comments certain ways then maybe the problem is you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    That's very fair and I did consider it, so I re-read the thread carefully before replying and I still fail to see why it'd be interpreted that way, happy to be pointed out exactly where I went wrong if I did :)

  • source
  • parent