you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 week ago* (4 children)

I understand that I'm not the target audience of this meme, but I'm confused. Isn't it an option to simply eat dinner?

Alternatively... to simply be hungry for an hour or three?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    The joke is that at the time of shopping we decide to be strong and be hungry, but when the time comes to test that determination, we don't have the strength of our past well-fed self.

    Also snacks imply something besides dinner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago*

    I'm still confused. I thought the Snack situation was,

    1. You're hungry,

    2. The chips are ready to eat,

    3. You eat the chips.

    So if there are no chips, you have to make something to eat instead, which becomes de facto Dinner. So the No Snack situation is

    1. You're hungry,

    2a. There is no food ready to eat,

    2b. You make food to eat,

    1. You eat the food.

    I might be off base here, but I don't snack, and I actually don't understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Dinner is not snacking.

    Dinner is a commitment. You make dinner to eat dinner.

    Evening snacking is optional and periodic. You can have few snacks. You can have many snacks. You can snack here or there. You can snack anywhere. You can snack reading a book. You can snack in a nook.

    If I make dinner... I am eating dinner. If I grab snacks, I might have a few laying in bed after ripping a joint and I can stop at any time. Just a few more chips. I'm good.

  • source
  • parent