you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Whenever you are using what someone is "known for' as your criticism, you lose legitimacy to your argument. See, Scott Jennings intentionally tried to make Piker "known for" lynchings. The "known for" something critique is a Trump style attack...." Everybody is talking about how Obama was born in Africa. Sounds like we shouldn't trust that guy.". It's lazy and malicious.

If you want to criticize Piker, do so for demonstrable conduct. All you did instead was signal to me your argument is bs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    He forms parasocial relationships with people for money like all twitch streamers or other streamers.

    You don’t have to believe it I’m not trying to change your mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

    and clowns do pratfalls to entertain people, or apparently, belittle people on lemmy to further their agenda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    You’re calling me a clown so I think you’re the only one belittling people in this conversation.

    But by all means continue to do so if it makes you feel better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    only if you own the clause,

    for someone who asks why we should even consider him important, you are very consistent in your attempt at dismissing him as a person. probably because he it’s important, and his arguments are hard to assail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment