you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -14 points 1 week ago (26 children)

Nice pivot from the sexism found in the left.

Biden and Harris ran a very similar campaign and it was okay when Biden ran it but not when a woman did.

The genocides are all worse now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    it was okay when Biden

    People were rightfully upset with Biden while he was in office. This is revisionism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Biden was the most progressive president since Carter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Ok. That doesn't have any bearing on what we're talking about.

    Biden wasn't praised where Harris was panned because of their gender.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Biden got elected with a platform 99% similar to the one that Harris lost with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    And then Oct 7th happened and the world saw what Israel was doing much clearer.

    Harris and Biden funded the genocide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    “Worse” doesn’t mean that Biden didn’t kill a lot of innocent people and children. Also Biden has killed more Palestinians than Trump has. Not sure how he’s been worse.

    The problem you’re missing IS that they ran the same campaign… and WHAT happened in between those two elections? What happened, say, early October 2023 and as a result of? I’ll let you figure that one out for yourself.

    Harris would have won if she moved left of Biden, woman or not. It was very clear that’s what we needed and it’s very clear they ran away from you (the blue voter) in favor of Trump voters. Why you’d still fall for it years later is beyond me.

    Does anyone else remember Tim Walz, governor of my great home state, who is on record saying he loves Isreal btw, told JD Vance in a debate about a “preemptive strike on Iran”? Because I do.

    Hell, does anyone even remember during the state of the union Trump said he would invade Iran to “protect its sovereignty a after evil government killed a bajillion protesters” or something dumb like that and fucking ELIZABETH WARREN GAVE HIM A STANDING OVATION?!? because I remember.

    People don’t see war and genocide in terms of “bad and worse” because that’s how children think and behave. Genocide is bad and genocidal democrats don’t deserve power because you think they’re a little bit better than the genocidal republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (17 children)

    Your view was the standard view in 2024/25, from corporate sources, and I think much of the population simply accepted that view, especially among liberals.

    But you've lost. And no one believes you or your sources in corporate media. Its clear that your ideology is bankrupt, so people have abandoned you.

    The hollowness and emptiness of your perspective is exactly why Hasan is ascendant, and you and your twins in corporate media are descendant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 week ago* (16 children)

    Between views like that and the constant purity testing it’s no wonder why leftism is so deeply unpopular in America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (14 children)
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (13 children)

    When your movement goes from 1% support to 3% it really feels that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (12 children)
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    Conservative Brief?

    Get better sources bro.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (10 children)

    You have the nuance of a cinderblock. I'm steel manning the argument: Because even the far right recognize the ascendancy and popularity of Democratic Socialism.

    Like, I don't actually believe you believe most of the shit you say any more. No one can be both this terminally online and simultaneously this obtuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    The far right are obviously going to exaggerate that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    You understand this is why you and yours have no relevancy right? This are basic ass debate-pervert tropes. These wouldn't even fly in 2001 internet debate.

    You don't like reality so you attack the source, which is practically a copy-pasta of the original pew poll.

    You are hollow. Your worldview is empty. You don't live in a verifiable, reproducible version of reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Headline:

    ‘About a third of U.S. Democrats like political leaders who identify as democratic socialists’

    Or a third of a half of Americans who register as democrat or republican like socialism.

    Now Democrats have 44.4 million registered members so you’re saying 14.8 million Americans out of 350 million like socialism which is like 4.2%.

    Sorry I under estimated it at 3%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    I mean you can twist yourself into pretzels all you like. But none of that twisting inside your mind changes the world outside of it: That's the hollowness I'm pointing out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    I used facts and numbers for my argument and you respond with that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    I used twisted facts and numbers for my argument demonstrated to be irrelevant and not based in reality worldview and you respond with that?

    ftfy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I see more feelings from you and no facts or numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    The fact is that Democratic Socialists have wiped the floor with "centrist" candidates from Palm Beach to Sacramento, and we're heading into what might the most extreme blue wave election since 1994, possibly ever, precisely because of people like Hasan Piker building up candidates in the primaries and killing centrism in the crib, where it deserves to die and stay dead. Worthless maggots on MSNow or MSNBC are now squealing because you've lost control of the narrative. But reality is that you did this to yourself.

    The idea that candidates should appeal to the "center" handed the country to fascism in 2024. That has now become the collective understanding. Progressivisim/ Democratic socialism is saving the country from fascism.

    Like you are arguing with yourself buddy, and its pathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments