244
CachyOS is adding a dedicated EACv2-compatible kernel plus a Secure Boot setup guide so users can optionally meet Epic’s new EACv2 requirements without changing their normal optimized kernel. (github.com)
submitted 1 week ago by to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://github.com/CachyOS/linux-cachyos/pull/1084

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 week ago (9 children)

This isn't putting anything sleazy in your kernel. Please take a look at my reply to another comment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Your reply doesn't make me sure if it is running on a similar privilege level to root.

    I don't use Linux to give that level of trust to anticheat, and I don't see the benefit at that point of dual booting Windows instead.

    So are you saying it doesn't get root type privileges? And can be as trusted to not be as invasive as anticheat is on windows being able to look through your entire system?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    From what I have found, the main difference between an eBPF program (which is what EACv2 contains) and an actual kernel module, seems to be that other parts of the kernel will be protected from EACv2. However, an eBPF program can spy on all your user space programs, read memory belonging to other processes, etc. They're also saying that the anti-cheat is going to include a systemd service, which I assume is going to run as root.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    So are you saying it doesn’t get root type privileges? And can be as trusted to not be as invasive as anticheat is on windows being able to look through your entire system?

    From my understanding, that's right. My understanding is very shallow though, so you should look into it yourself if you really care enough. I think the links I posted are enough of a starting point.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

    Even assuming what you said is right: fucking link the other comment, no one is gonna hunt another random comment that we don't even know it's right

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I didn't because linking to a post or comment on Lemmy (or the fediverse at large) is awful. Does this work? https://vger.to/discuss.tchncs.de/comment/29001869

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    I suggest to disable the voyager redirect in the settings, idk where it is tho

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •