▲ 452 ▼ In China, the AI bubble has already burst (www.reuters.com) submitted 1 week ago by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Ferrous@lemmy.ml -12 points 1 week ago (4 children) Why not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children) Because the government disappears dissenters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 week ago* (2 children) So then why in the same study do we see abysmal ratings for other authoritian dictatorships? Iraq, Kazakhstan, Cameroon, Russia, etc... If your point is that civilians in authoritarian regimes are coerced to show support in these types of polls, the results prove that notion wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* India being listed as a democracy doesn't help this point. India being above China and New Zealand is wild. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago Does this study address the difference in circumstances? I can see for example China having the resources to maintain total surveillance abd strong censorship (especially on the internet) vs a developing country in Africa which may affect polling permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children) Because the government disappears dissenters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 week ago* (2 children) So then why in the same study do we see abysmal ratings for other authoritian dictatorships? Iraq, Kazakhstan, Cameroon, Russia, etc... If your point is that civilians in authoritarian regimes are coerced to show support in these types of polls, the results prove that notion wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* India being listed as a democracy doesn't help this point. India being above China and New Zealand is wild. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago Does this study address the difference in circumstances? I can see for example China having the resources to maintain total surveillance abd strong censorship (especially on the internet) vs a developing country in Africa which may affect polling permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 week ago* (2 children) So then why in the same study do we see abysmal ratings for other authoritian dictatorships? Iraq, Kazakhstan, Cameroon, Russia, etc... If your point is that civilians in authoritarian regimes are coerced to show support in these types of polls, the results prove that notion wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* India being listed as a democracy doesn't help this point. India being above China and New Zealand is wild. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago Does this study address the difference in circumstances? I can see for example China having the resources to maintain total surveillance abd strong censorship (especially on the internet) vs a developing country in Africa which may affect polling permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* India being listed as a democracy doesn't help this point. India being above China and New Zealand is wild. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago Does this study address the difference in circumstances? I can see for example China having the resources to maintain total surveillance abd strong censorship (especially on the internet) vs a developing country in Africa which may affect polling permalink fedilink source parent