1119
Creative Title (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not really a meme meme, but i felt like i had to :s

The "1984 Calendar" meme template where the woman says "Payment processors are banning NSFW content on all platforms by threatening to stop processing payments."
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

Cool. So why would I ever want that?

So that anyone can buy what they want from whoever they want. So that payment processors cannot hold or be held by certain groups for ransom.

You know, the whole point of this thread.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Okay, so. First comment made this argument, to which I fired back that I'm not interested because:

    Crypto is not a currency Is an environmental disaster Has massive deflation

    And since this thread has begun we've changed that to:

    Is not a currency (you ceded this when you said that transactions would be in USD, just with the crypto as the value carrier) Are mostly environmental disasters Has massive deflation (you ceded this again with your transactional argument)

    Damn, your powers of persuasion are beyond my comprehension. /s

    Seriously, the fuck are we doing here? You just wanna talk about nothing? I rather think daisies are pretty. What're your thoughts?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Crypto is not a currency Is an environmental disaster Has massive deflation

    My first response delt with this. Only bitcoin is an environmental disaster. Deflation is only relevant if you hold a currency long term. Irrelevant for payment processing.

    Seriously, the fuck are we doing here?

    We are discussing how to counter the monopoly stranglehold of payment processors. Crypto is a possible solution that is viable today.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Alright. Here's an argument why crypto doesn't do that.

    Today: Me Payment processor Vendor

    Crypto tomorrow: Me Payment processor Crypto Crypto fees Payment processor Vendor

    So not only am I paying the payment processor twice as much for the interaction (it doesn't matter which processor, since the issue at hand is their monopoly) thus rewarding their censorship, I also wasted a whole bunch more money for the privilege.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yes, the round trip is more expensive.

    But if you receive some income in crypto and park it in a stablecoin (like USDC) then you can avoid the price volatility risks and round trip fees. The crypto fees are much less than 2% and this also avoids rewarding censorship.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent