16
Russian web brigades - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

i don't think it's as simple as 'covering bases' to be going up against a well-resourced party structure on its own terms and expecting change. to me that is an unrealistic expectation.

i'd rather see challengers running under a different party, i just have zero confidence in the democrats at this point.

i still vote because it's convenient, i even vote in primaries and municipal. i usually just write in bullshit for all the races that are unopposed or where the democrat also sucks ass. we don't have a national popular vote so my vote for president is essentially meaningless.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    i don't think it's as simple as 'covering bases' to be going up against a well-resourced party structure on its own terms and expecting change. to me that is an unrealistic expectation.

    There are weaknesses in most structures, you just have to find them. The right-wing takeover of the USA has demonstrated this, even if it did take them decades to accomplish it.

    i'd rather see challengers running under a different party, i just have zero confidence in the democrats at this point.

    There have been other parties for quite some time. They're lucky to have even 1% of the population's awareness, however. America's electoral system virtually guarantee it'll stay this way, which is why I see disrupting the Democratic party from within as the more likely to be viable approach for the time being. We can work towards progressives splitting off into their own party at some point, but they need to get bigger first or they'll lose and take their reputations down with that loss.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    i promise that i am not trying to get all debate-y, however this is circular.

    progressives need to get bigger inside the democratic party before they can leave, but the democratic party structurally prevents them from getting big enough to matter.

    the right wing takeover of the republicans was because we have a politics where money speaks louder than people. that's why i don't expect a left wing takeover of the democrats will work either.

    a workers party isn’t going to emerge from inside the democratic party. it’s going to emerge from the kind of organizing and dual power building that creates enough independent capacity to make electoral politics secondary rather than the primary terrain.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    progressives need to get bigger inside the democratic party before they can leave, but the democratic party structurally prevents them from getting big enough to matter.

    The DNC certainly puts up a hell of a fight, yet more progressives are set to take up positions within the party. There are a good number on ballots across the US, and it's inevitable the number will grow this November. I get the pessimism - really, I do - but I think it's possible to overcome the power of the DNC establishment, especially as a number of them (like Pelosi) age out.

    the right wing takeover of the republicans was because we have a politics where money speaks louder than people. that's why i don't expect a left wing takeover of the democrats will work either.

    The thing is that only works when enough of their constituency also feel like they're making enough money to be comfortable. With the wealth of the country being concentrated into fewer and fewer people, that also means there are fewer who feel that way. That, IMHO, is a significant part of the reason why progressives have started seeing so many successes of late.

    Nonetheless, I'm interested in hearing what alternative approaches you feel would work better. Up until the next quote, you've been very vague about what you mean, so thank you for the next bit:

    a workers party isn’t going to emerge from inside the democratic party. it’s going to emerge from the kind of organizing and dual power building that creates enough independent capacity to make electoral politics secondary rather than the primary terrain.

    That does indeed seem extremely ambitious, and I'm curious how you see that coming about short of a full-on revolution. I'm assuming "tankies" are well-versed in this, but I am not, and that may be the source of the problem. Unfortunately, being less educated in this area means I likely can't just dive into reading the literature I've occasionally seen recommended. The way my mind works requires an overarching summary for me to build my exploration of the subject upon - without the groundwork, it can quickly become all too abstract for my mind to put the pieces together.

    So, got any ELI5-level explainers? Please & TY.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    pelosi + co aging out just means a new crop of corporate democrats take over. the machine does not depend on individuals and there's plenty of young ghouls waiting in the wings.

    'progressive' is pretty much branding at this point. someone can call themselves progressive while supporting weapons shipments to a genocide and opposing medicare for all because it's 'not politically feasible'

    the label does no analytical work at all.

    I'm assuming "tankies" are well-versed in this

    they tend to be, i'm an anarchist and i've had many mls work with me in a positive way locally over the years.

    I'm curious how you see that coming about short of a full-on revolution.

    i did spell it out in that same statement, but maybe it was not clear enough.

    when i said 'organizing and dual power building' i'm thinking of things like mutual aid as entrypoint. the idea that building networks where people can take care of eachother outside the market both meets immidiate needs and builds the relationships to make future organizing possible.

    the ELI5 version would be summed up as 'build things that work outside the market, make peoples lives better now, demonstrate that another way of organizing is possible. 'voting' may be a tiny sliver of your time in the year, but electoral politics takes an inordinate amount of resources and time. despite all that effort any one election can flip the script on decades of work.

    i could recommend reading material if you're interested in de-naturalizing some of the operational assumptions of capitalism.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    pelosi + co aging out just means a new crop of corporate democrats take over. the machine does not depend on individuals and there's plenty of young ghouls waiting in the wings.'progressive' is pretty much branding at this point. someone can call themselves progressive while supporting weapons shipments to a genocide and opposing medicare for all because it's 'not politically feasible'the label does no analytical work at all.

    All true & reasonably fair. I guess I just have been trying to allow some room for having to work within the system as it currently stands, but I do also fear the corruption of the well-intended is real & potentially permanent. I've been hoping the addition of more progressives would help counterbalance that - and am still waiting to see if that plays out, but you may well be right in that there is no return from the dark side.

    i'm an anarchist

    Oh, cool! I've actually kinda begun looking at that community a bit closer recently as what little I've gleaned from posts I've seen seems to more closely fit my perspectives than other alternatives (you can see I'm just not "getting" the .ml left). Just preliminary starting to pay them more attention at this point, but definitely interested.

    when i said 'organizing and dual power building' i'm thinking of things like mutual aid as entrypoint. the idea that building networks where people can take care of eachother outside the market both meets immidiate needs and builds the relationships to make future organizing possible.

    Yep, that's what I'd like to see, too. I'm curious how the inevitable bad players are prevented from using/abusing/destroying such idealist constructs, tho. I admit my life has made me perhaps a bit too cynical, but I just don't see those sorts of initiatives surviving long-term against the high proportion of ill-willed people out there.

    the ELI5 version

    Okay, I asked for that. That's more than little too vague to help. I guess I'm looking for something concrete & just detailed enough to be able to picture it in action. What I was trying to avoid was a high proportion of theory. I'm someone who needs to see it working first, then get to know "how," and finally the "why" of how it works after that.

    i could recommend reading material

    My patience for reading heady stuff of late seems to be tied to my level of understanding and strength of interest. I like it concrete, to-the-point, with just enough detail to get the idea without being too wordy (which I know seems at odds with the way I write ::shrug::) It's just the way I structured my information intake over the course of my life while trying to teach myself about the world at large). That's the best way to get through to me. If you know of anything like that, please do share!

    Finally, it's well past bedtime for me. I'd really like to thank you for this conversation. I can be very thick-headed, and appreciate you sticking with me through it. Unfortunately, I've GOT to get some sleep as I've been up over 36 hrs at this point with only a couple short naps, and I just can't do this stuff anymore like when as i was young.

    Thanks again so much! Good night.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    i ended up going to sleep as well.

    I’m curious how the inevitable bad players are prevented from using/abusing/destroying such idealist constructs,

    i gotta point out a nomenclature difference here. you're using 'idealist' colloquially to mean unrealistic/naive, however it has a philosophical meaning too and what i'm doing is manifestly not idealist. mutual aid isn’t a utopian vision, it’s a description of something that already exists and has always existed. working class and marginalized communities have always built these networks because the alternative is not surviving. mutual aid as a concept predates the theory, the theory just names what people were already doing.

    mutual aid networks deal with bad actors through community accountability rather than hierarchical enforcement, which is actually more resilient than it sounds because the relationships built through the work create real social fabric.

    That’s more than little too vague to help. I guess I’m looking for something concrete & just detailed enough to be able to picture it in action.

    are you familiar with the black panther breakfast program or food not bombs? here's a short article on the subject of mutual aid in general if that's more helpful, or a pamphlet if you prefer

    you may well be right in that there is no return from the dark side.

    for me i just try to be realistic about my limitations. i've seen enough electoral cycles to find them draining with no payoff. even if you 'win' there's going to be a deal cut and you don't have any way to really punish the politicians once they're in office. directing that energy to helping people in my surroundings year-round means i can build something that feeds my neighbors and attracts others to continue the work. it's not charity, you don't answer to a board or people with money, you just get together with your friends and work together, everyone takes from it what they need.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (1 child)

    I'm sorry for dropping this convo so abruptly. I've hardly been on these past few days as my mother - who has Alzheimer's - has been put into a psych ward for a three day suicide watch by my brother. Needless to say, I've been a bit distracted & hardly online except for brief distractions while waiting for things. Just wanted to let you know it wasn't you (or me being a jerk). I'll have to get back into this stuff later. Thanks again for talking with me, tho.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    don't worry, real life always comes before posting online.

    i appreciated the conversation as well, feel free to reach out in the future if and when it's convenient for you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent