you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

deeply antisocial

It doesn't really have to be. The problem is that the profits that comes from that machine are not spread among the working people - that would be the social way to implement it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's only one of many harms it does to the human experience. Look at a company like Facebook. Do you think socializing that industry and sharing the profits with the users would mitigate the harms it does to our lives? I sure don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago*

    It in fact would, because there would be no incentive to keep it like it is - it would never have been made so bad if it was a democratic decision.

    Facebook and Co. is bad today because there's a conflict of interest between users and shareholders, and Zuckerberg chose the shareholders cause they line his pockets. This conflict would not exist if it was democratic.

  • source
  • parent