▲ 38 ▼ It's Friday 10/16/2026. Hey, What's Going On! (lemmy.world) submitted 3 weeks ago by Lexam@lemmy.world to c/autism@lemmy.world 21 comments fedilink hide all child comments And today is our 28yr dating anniversary! For this special occasion I share with you Bert's belly! This post is for casual conversation if you don’t feel like making a post of your own.
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (5 children) I'm sorry, what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children) I've had to sit with this for a few days because it really felt like I was being attacked for performing incorrectly. I think - well, hope -that we are having different conversations. How I perceived it: I made a comment using a well known internet rhetoric device illustrating behaviours I didn't understand you castigated me for "tribalism" and said I shouldn't judge based on the actions of one person I pointed out it was more than one person and i still didn't understand why the behaviour occurred Your comment here...does not make sense to me in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) My comment is because of this: Couple of arseholes, more than one downvote. Still not understanding why. I understood exactly zero of that. Nada. The mention to down votes was particularly puzzling as, at the time, there was exactly one downvote on your comment. I'm still no closer to understanding you there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) The full context mentioned that after I pointed out the unhelpfulness of the comment I got downvoted and - they literally said this - "ok then let's fight" Efit; on review it was"argue", not fight. I'm not sure if your instance shows ratios, but I had multiple downvotes, and some upvotes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) My brother in tism, you're making less sense by the minute. There's only you and me here, and no one mentioned a fight: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* You do realise that when speaking of the initial event and "downvotes" am literally talking about a comment chain that occured ELSEWHERE, right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children) I've had to sit with this for a few days because it really felt like I was being attacked for performing incorrectly. I think - well, hope -that we are having different conversations. How I perceived it: I made a comment using a well known internet rhetoric device illustrating behaviours I didn't understand you castigated me for "tribalism" and said I shouldn't judge based on the actions of one person I pointed out it was more than one person and i still didn't understand why the behaviour occurred Your comment here...does not make sense to me in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) My comment is because of this: Couple of arseholes, more than one downvote. Still not understanding why. I understood exactly zero of that. Nada. The mention to down votes was particularly puzzling as, at the time, there was exactly one downvote on your comment. I'm still no closer to understanding you there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) The full context mentioned that after I pointed out the unhelpfulness of the comment I got downvoted and - they literally said this - "ok then let's fight" Efit; on review it was"argue", not fight. I'm not sure if your instance shows ratios, but I had multiple downvotes, and some upvotes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) My brother in tism, you're making less sense by the minute. There's only you and me here, and no one mentioned a fight: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* You do realise that when speaking of the initial event and "downvotes" am literally talking about a comment chain that occured ELSEWHERE, right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) My comment is because of this: Couple of arseholes, more than one downvote. Still not understanding why. I understood exactly zero of that. Nada. The mention to down votes was particularly puzzling as, at the time, there was exactly one downvote on your comment. I'm still no closer to understanding you there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) The full context mentioned that after I pointed out the unhelpfulness of the comment I got downvoted and - they literally said this - "ok then let's fight" Efit; on review it was"argue", not fight. I'm not sure if your instance shows ratios, but I had multiple downvotes, and some upvotes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) My brother in tism, you're making less sense by the minute. There's only you and me here, and no one mentioned a fight: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* You do realise that when speaking of the initial event and "downvotes" am literally talking about a comment chain that occured ELSEWHERE, right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) The full context mentioned that after I pointed out the unhelpfulness of the comment I got downvoted and - they literally said this - "ok then let's fight" Efit; on review it was"argue", not fight. I'm not sure if your instance shows ratios, but I had multiple downvotes, and some upvotes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) My brother in tism, you're making less sense by the minute. There's only you and me here, and no one mentioned a fight: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* You do realise that when speaking of the initial event and "downvotes" am literally talking about a comment chain that occured ELSEWHERE, right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) My brother in tism, you're making less sense by the minute. There's only you and me here, and no one mentioned a fight: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* You do realise that when speaking of the initial event and "downvotes" am literally talking about a comment chain that occured ELSEWHERE, right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* You do realise that when speaking of the initial event and "downvotes" am literally talking about a comment chain that occured ELSEWHERE, right? permalink fedilink source parent