this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025

292 points (93.2% liked)

PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,872 readers

5,821 active

864 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Please, don't post articles "this/that store ban nsfw content": it's payment system (like Visa/MasterCard) that want to regulate/take control of censorship above your government. (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More than a request, I think it's a deserving clarification. We're getting mob outrage against Valve, Itch.io etc... while it's just Visa/MasterCard/Paypal laughing on everyone back.

Thanks reading my TEDx

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

Corporations do not give a single fuck about "angry, organized people", only money.

parent

hideshow 8 child comments

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

They care about bad PR. Angry, organized people can create lots of bad PR.

Look, this whole subthread is jumping to conclusions based on speculation. Maybe they are using legal strategies, but that's not obvious.

parent

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

Don't believe that either.

I'm not jumping to conclusions, I'm asking questions.

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

Where did you ask a question in this reply chain?

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

Not me but

How do they apply pressure though?

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Copy the whole thing:

How do they apply pressure though? (they threaten to sue)

Beside the fact that it wasn't even you, they made a specific answer to that question as if it was authoritative. They were not "just asking questions", either.

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

You're being needlessly pedantic. If it makes you feel better, I can ask the question again:

How do they apply pressure?

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I answered that above already. Good bye.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago

You didn't answer anything about why they would care about PR. Is it your position that people would stop using CCs because some entity got noisy about them being used to buy pr0n?

parent