you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Yes, but he still instigated the events that lead to the colonization of the americas, north america included:

Columbus's expeditions inaugurated a period of exploration, conquest, and colonization that lasted for centuries, thus bringing the Americas into the European sphere of influence. The transfer of plants, animals, precious metals, culture, human populations, technology, diseases, and ideas between the Old World and New World that followed his first voyage are known as the Columbian exchange, named after him. These events and the effects which persist to the present are often cited as the beginning of the modern era. ^(^^source^^)^

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    That's nice but fuck that guy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    ... What part of that makes you think it was said in support of Columbus?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    The fact that you presented it as a counter-point. Perhaps I was mistaken and you meant it sarcastically?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    You may be confused - you presented as questioning why Columbus Day was a concern on a landmass he never set foot on; I explained the impact he had on the people here, even though it was more indirect than south or central america (and as has been pointed out he did land in north america, albeit in the Caribbean/Cuba).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment