I'd rather not speak Ill of the dead... So I'll be quiet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Agreed but with the caveat that Thiel's money should not have been able to influence it one way or another. It should have been a criminal case resulting in end of business license.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah exactly, Thiel's opinion and power should not have been factors but Gawker should not have existed by that point in the first place so karma and all that.

    2 abuses of power cancelled eachother out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    thiel was the sole reason he even won the lawsuit, which means terry dint have much of a case agains thim in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Publishing pornography of someone without their consent is a crime.

    The justice system sided with Hogan in the end and unless you're alleging bribery that's not a matter of who paid, but that the trial was brought to its conclusion instead of settling out of court because the multinational publishing corporation won the money fight, something enabled by Thiel's money, but also something that shouldn't have been necessary in the first place.

  • source
  • parent