▲ 77 ▼ US has lost or sustained damage to 81 military aircraft worth up to $3.3 billion in Iran war, congressional report says (edition.cnn.com) submitted 3 weeks ago by JanMayen to c/war_room 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments That’s almost double the 42 aircraft the non-partisan agency counted in a report released six months ago.
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (6 children) That's a rounding error on the audit errors. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] weps@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago that's another plane in the Pentagon during the next audit permalink fedilink source parent [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children) What are the audit "errors" when they're on purpose? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children) They're still audit errors, regardless of intent. The auditor: I can't account for these expenditures, into the "errors" basket they go. Or, these are errors as in outliers rather than errors as in mistakes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) I don't disagree, and considering the disgusting lack of consequences in this era, it's a useless quibble. 🤢 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Having spent some few years now studying (my country's) late 19th century history: it's not specific to this era. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why anyone would assume otherwise, honestly. It's the same old shit, just a different fork they're handing us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] weps@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago that's another plane in the Pentagon during the next audit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children) What are the audit "errors" when they're on purpose? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children) They're still audit errors, regardless of intent. The auditor: I can't account for these expenditures, into the "errors" basket they go. Or, these are errors as in outliers rather than errors as in mistakes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) I don't disagree, and considering the disgusting lack of consequences in this era, it's a useless quibble. 🤢 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Having spent some few years now studying (my country's) late 19th century history: it's not specific to this era. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why anyone would assume otherwise, honestly. It's the same old shit, just a different fork they're handing us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children) They're still audit errors, regardless of intent. The auditor: I can't account for these expenditures, into the "errors" basket they go. Or, these are errors as in outliers rather than errors as in mistakes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) I don't disagree, and considering the disgusting lack of consequences in this era, it's a useless quibble. 🤢 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Having spent some few years now studying (my country's) late 19th century history: it's not specific to this era. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why anyone would assume otherwise, honestly. It's the same old shit, just a different fork they're handing us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) I don't disagree, and considering the disgusting lack of consequences in this era, it's a useless quibble. 🤢 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Having spent some few years now studying (my country's) late 19th century history: it's not specific to this era. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why anyone would assume otherwise, honestly. It's the same old shit, just a different fork they're handing us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Having spent some few years now studying (my country's) late 19th century history: it's not specific to this era. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why anyone would assume otherwise, honestly. It's the same old shit, just a different fork they're handing us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why anyone would assume otherwise, honestly. It's the same old shit, just a different fork they're handing us. permalink fedilink source parent