It's become somewhat of a meme now when there is a story on crime, or other bad things happening in a city, people pipe up and say "That's how it is in blue cities!" "This could only happen in a Democrat city!" However, I noticed they never say "... and that's why only want to live in X" or "... that would never happen in Y".

If living in "blue cities" are such a nightmare, where are all these Utopian "red cities" that people are apparently in favor of?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 175 points 1 year ago (25 children)

the funny thing is... getting people to live closer together encourages empathy.

living in the middle of nowhere reduces empathy... this is why people living in bumfuck are empathy-lacking tools calling themselves 'conservatives'

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] [S] 45 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    It seems like a lot of the time they are like "boy, crime is higher".... but if you live in a city that's just a fact of life. It's pretty obvious that there will be less crime out in the sticks. I wouldn't really attribute this to any "blue" policies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Part of "less crime in the sticks" is a population effect. The rate of violent crime in New York City is 494/100,000 people. The rate of violent crime in the whole state of Alabama, from its stickiest sticks to the 225,000-resident Huntsville metropolis, is 404/100,000, which isn't that different, in my book.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    I suspect that's just because of Birmingham, and possibly Mobile. They have pretty bad crime rates, and Birmingham is the state's main "blue city", at least based on how counties voted in the 2024 election.

    Birmingham had a violent crime rate of 1440 per 100k, making it one the worst cities in the nation for violent crime.

    Mobile had a crime rate of 825 per 100k. Mobile's county was slightly red in the 2023 election.

    Meanwhile Huntsville (who was slightly red in that same election) had a violent crime rate of 133 per 100k, and has been proudly claiming a 100% arrest and conviction rate for homicide cases. So to answer @yarr@feddit.nl's question, I guess Huntsville is an example of a successful "red" city (although it may be less successful in coming years due to Trump's NASA cuts).

    Rural Alabama (excluding counties that were classified as metropolitan) had a violent crime rate of 248 per 100k, making it less safe than Huntsville but far better than the state average of 494 per 100k.

    I'm not going to actually claim that the crime rate is just from politics, Huntsville has a big aerospace industry and it's probably more of an education/class thing than anything else. But regardless those are the violent crime rate numbers for 2023, so feel free to draw your own conclusions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    100% arrest and conviction rate doesnt really mean anything. Sounds like theyre just arresting whoever and corrupting the jury to convict. Iirc only about 1/3 homicides are solvable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    https://www.al.com/news/huntsville/2022/07/no-homicide-case-went-unsolved-in-huntsville-in-2021.html

    Here's an article on it, it was actually in 2021 (where the rest of the data was from 2023) so the 100% rate probably isn't the case anymore. Basically they attribute it to having a really low base crime rate compared to other cities, saying that it frees them up to give a lot of attention and resources to each one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's usually lower per capita. Right wing media likes to report in nominal numbers, because have 10 crimes sounds like a lot more than 2 crimes. But when you see it's 10 out of 1000 (1%) people vs 2 out of 50 (4%) it doesn't look as good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was biking a dirt road near my rural neighborhood and saw a sign at somebody's driveway that said "if you can read this you're within range" and wondered how country folk got the stereotype of being friendly and kind. I really miss living in the city.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    propaganda from the movies and shows. probably they need economic businesses to thier area, so they make up an image so people would go there, but NOT LIVE THERE. Yellowstone being one of those shows, and many other shows make reference of "southern hospitality"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not saying you're wrong, because I believe I've seen patterns like this (but can also think of quite a fee counter examples). But do you have any evidence for this, or is it just a hypothesis?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban%E2%80%93rural_political_divide

    the empathy is an inference from a documentary i saw where people have had some success in rural communities changing hearts and minds by befriending them. it turns out its easy to lack empathy for people youve never associated with and you have always been told are less than yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It's the opposite in Sweden. Countryside leans left and cities lean right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    i think there are different socioconomics in play in sweden. lots of real immigration management issues unlike the united states made up ones.

    also, sweden is more than an order of magnitude different in size (< 5% actually) of the unites states. 'rural' sweden isnt the same thing as 'rural' US.

    also, i doubt the swedish rednecks are thirsty to get back to their slaving roots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    The trend has been true for longer than the last 25 years, well before the current immigration crisis.

    The alternate explanation is that the party or parties that has the most pro rural policies eg. farm subsidies are popular among the rural people and vice versa.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    what're you on about? the most voted party in all 3 big cities is the socdems, rural places are WAY WAY WAY more right leaning than urban areas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The most voted party in most places is S. But they are much more popular in more rural towns. So is SD but they mainly take the votes from the right before left.

    S:M:SD Biggest: Stockholm 28:19:10 Göteborg: 27:18:15 Malmö 30:18:16

    Smallest: Dorotea: 43:7:21 Bjurholm: 30:20;24 Sorsele: 39:12:25.

  • source
  • parent