448
Commie Blocs (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
161 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Believe you me, they are used today not by choice. You need to stretch the definition of inhabitable significantly to include 80 years old mass construction buildings in it. Unless those Theseus shipped over the decades, but even then. Buildings from ancient Rome still standing today, it's really not that big of a bragging rights to have some of the homes be technically upright after 80 years.
Ironically, the only buildings from post-war era that survived in my hometown are only those that were built by Germans as part of the reparations. Make of that what you will.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    No one said they were being used by choice. The very reason behind their original purpose was precisely because people didn’t have anywhere else to live, not because they thought people would genuinely choose to live there over a normal home.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The whole premise of the meme is that we should be in awe how amazing commyblocks are, and how greatly they survive even to this days.
    The reality, that nobody disagrees with, is that post-war USSR very quickly built a bunch of cheap housing that was planned to be gradually replaced by a more nicely built ones, and a lot of them weren't. This isn't controversial, and not worth the meme. So the meme stretches this to mean something else.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The premise of the meme is that the problem of affordable housing could be very easily solved if the western world was willing to acknowledge that sometimes socialists have good ideas.

    This would not necessarily solve the problem of affordable quality housing, but it would be a very effective step in the right direction.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    First of all, no, it isn't. Like, textually isn't.
    Second, situation in post-war USSR is vastly different from the modern western countries. The problem isn't lack of housing, it's using housing as commodities. If you can create a system that can build millions of shitty crumbling concrete gravestones, you'd better use fraction of this system's power to make laws that prevent commodification of housing, so it becomes affordable, and this will be the better outcome. And that's also one of those good socialist ideas actually.
    But again, we're not talking about the original point anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    First of all, no, it isn't. Like, textually isn't.

    Then explain the “Liberals” part of the meme.

    The problem isn't lack of housing, it's using housing as commodities. If you can create a system that can build millions of shitty crumbling concrete gravestones, you'd better use fraction of this system's power to make laws that prevent commodification of housing, so it becomes affordable, and this will be the better outcome.

    I agree

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent