222
The Public Utility Commission of Texas is asking a judge to block the release of information showing where data centers operate, saying it could aid terrorists (www.texastribune.org)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago* (4 children)

"How a word is used" is not the same as "how you personally use a word"

Individuals don't get to determine the meaning of words, and that's what you're trying to do by insisting that "terrorist" has some kind of special meaning beyond "enemy of the state". Words are defined by law and history and society and usage, not individuals.

Legally, a "terrorist" can only be a "designated enemy of the state"

Historically, "terrorist" has always just meant "designated enemy of the state"

Socially, a "terrorist" is just used to refer to "designated enemy of the state"

And, in common usage, "terrorist" just means "designated enemy of the state"

You're trying to insist on some more concrete meaning beyond this, and it's just not real. It's a useless word for us.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    A person, group, or organization that uses violent action, or the threat of violent action, to further political goals; frequently in an attempt to coerce either a more powerful opponent, (such as a citizen or group targeting a government), or conversely, a weaker opponent, (such as a government, or even an internal citizen or group, being targeted by a larger government).

    I already quoted the literal definition of the word. I’ve made no reference to how I personally use the word. I’ve never actually had pccasion to call anyone a terrorist.

    You seem to be getting a little worked up about this. Perhaps it’s best to agree to disagree here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children)

    You quoted a definition, but a definition that has nothing to do with how it is used legally, historically, or socially i.e. useless

    Words are defined by their use, not by dictionaries. That's why the meaning of words tends to change over time.

    Accusing me of getting "worked up" is a good way to discredit everything I have to say, though. Cute.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You quoted a definition, but a definition that has nothing to do with how it is used legally, historically, or socially i.e. useless

    I’m sorry but this statement is flat out wrong. Perhaps reading about terrorism will clear this up.

    I’d also recommend the US legal definition within federal law.

    That's why the meaning of words tends to change over time.

    Yes they do, which is why I posted the modern definition and not the original from the French Revolution:

    1. An agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.

    Accusing me of getting "worked up" is a good way to discredit everything I have to say, though. Cute.

    My intention was not to discredit you, it was based on your defensive language. You seem to take the disagreement personally.

    I’m going to disengage now. As-salamu alaykum.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •