you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Well, that was just about the most liberal dreck I've ever seen.

No, I'm using it the way political philosophers use it, which is to refer to a specific system oriented around capital and individualism (which is why "rights," refers to access to the pursuit of property) that emerged through European imperialism and settler-colonialism in the modern period.

Neoliberalism is a useful term if you care about all that intellectual (🤮) nonsense though, which you don't seem to. Unless of course, you're about to tell me about some amazing scholarship you read to form this opinion of "yours." I mean, you know the Latin and everything and that's like, most of the stuff.

Fittingly, you didn't even care about eugenics in Canada with the exact thing you just advocated for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

    The strangest part about this whole diatribe is the assumption that developmental disabilities or neuroatypicality are even hereditary in the first place. Every race has about 1 to 4 in 1,000 for autism with minute variations between, for example.

    If anybody here sounds like a eugenicist it's definitely you.

    That all aside for a moment I never even really advocated for assisted suicide, just mentioned that it would fudge suicide numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    This is some echochamber shit for real, I don't even know what this is meant to reference from my comments.

    "I'm not a eugenicist because I use 'race' and 'genetics' synonymously to suggest that autism isn't hereditary," is a hyper-level of self-validating reasoning, so much that I'm seriously unsure if this is an AI that just read "eugenics," and inadvertently plugged the idea that race is like, a natural thing (seriously, I'm surprised phrenology wasn't referenced). "Disabled," also doesn't just mean "autistic," but at this point who knows what the fuck you think you're saying.

    To anyone else who comes across this, is this a bot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (3 children)

    If you don't see how its prevalance across every race defeats the notion of it targeting a specific or distinct genetic group then you're an idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Right.... which is why cancer isn't hereditary (it often is highly effected by genetics), because all humans can potentially experience it, and as we all know, people are genetically incompatible along the lines of the 12 tribes of Israel.

    What the fuck do you actually think you're saying? I feel like I just came across some like, gestated Facebook conspiracy theory rn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    The fuck are you talking about? Are you trying to lose a Nike Contract, Kanye? 12 tribes, pfft, turtles all the way down I bet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment