▲ 160 ▼ Apple Ordered to Pay $5.7 Billion for Infringing Haptics Patent in iPhone, Apple Watch (www.cnet.com) submitted 1 month ago by TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (8 children) Its always nice to find good news in my feed permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) How is this good news? Haptic feedback has existed since the 1970s. This patent should be invalid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] timochka@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) So I looked into this and you are right and I am wrong. Deleting my previous posts since there’s more to this case than just haptics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Even if it's like catching Al capone on tax fraud, it's still good to get the baddie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) Rewarding a patent troll is never a good thing. It just means no one will be able to use haptic feedback without paying a toll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they really a patent troll though? It's apparently a headphone company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago They have one headphone license for one model from crossair, that is worth less money that what they spent on lawyers for this trial. They are a patent troll. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) How is this good news? Haptic feedback has existed since the 1970s. This patent should be invalid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] timochka@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) So I looked into this and you are right and I am wrong. Deleting my previous posts since there’s more to this case than just haptics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Even if it's like catching Al capone on tax fraud, it's still good to get the baddie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) Rewarding a patent troll is never a good thing. It just means no one will be able to use haptic feedback without paying a toll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they really a patent troll though? It's apparently a headphone company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago They have one headphone license for one model from crossair, that is worth less money that what they spent on lawyers for this trial. They are a patent troll. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] timochka@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) So I looked into this and you are right and I am wrong. Deleting my previous posts since there’s more to this case than just haptics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) So I looked into this and you are right and I am wrong. Deleting my previous posts since there’s more to this case than just haptics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Even if it's like catching Al capone on tax fraud, it's still good to get the baddie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) Rewarding a patent troll is never a good thing. It just means no one will be able to use haptic feedback without paying a toll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they really a patent troll though? It's apparently a headphone company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago They have one headphone license for one model from crossair, that is worth less money that what they spent on lawyers for this trial. They are a patent troll. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) Rewarding a patent troll is never a good thing. It just means no one will be able to use haptic feedback without paying a toll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they really a patent troll though? It's apparently a headphone company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago They have one headphone license for one model from crossair, that is worth less money that what they spent on lawyers for this trial. They are a patent troll. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they really a patent troll though? It's apparently a headphone company. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago They have one headphone license for one model from crossair, that is worth less money that what they spent on lawyers for this trial. They are a patent troll. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago They have one headphone license for one model from crossair, that is worth less money that what they spent on lawyers for this trial. They are a patent troll. permalink fedilink source parent