Yeah thats the point I was trying to make.

Why is it talked about so onesidedly when it is actually multi-facetted? The blog to me reads like: "there are legal reasons against AI and there are fanatic reasons against AI, so we yive you the option to disable it (but actually it's totally great as we all know and agree)."

I wish they'd addressed it in a more nuanced way or not at all. Just saying "It is now a config" would have been enough, but they went out of their way to point out only the subset of the arguments that can be easily dismissed.

Guess they have a product to sell that rides on the succsess of AI coding.