-28
Philosophy Question Time (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
NSFW 9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Okay, so if a bot uses AI to generate shitty grainy unflattering dick-pics and send those unsolicited to people, is that still wrong?

To receive a picture (pic) of a dick that never was, attached to a man that could never harm you, as but a figment of the bits? In the absence of implication?

I mean, ignoring whatever ethics you feel about the generation of AI images in general...

Maybe I'm too sleepy... 😴

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago

Let me reword your question with an entirely darker and more 'really happening in the world' version of what you're asking here ;

"If grok generates CSAM at a user's request, and then posts it on twitter, is twitter still hosting CSAM even though it isn't a 'real' human?"

(The Occupied courts of america say 'no', but we all know why that is)

Because it's not about how the image came to be, it's about what the image contains.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •