you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -82 points 1 month ago (39 children)

Hate to be that guy:

Today, Zionism is often seen in a negative light, and “Zionist” is regularly used as an insult. A common misconception is that Zionism is the same as colonizing Palestinian territories. That is not correct: at its core, Zionism means the aspiration for a Jewish state. At the same time, there are indeed settlers in Israel who seize Palestinian land, and the war in Gaza is often viewed in this context. It is important to distinguish between these settlers and the broader meaning of Zionism.

https://www.annefrank.org/en/topics/antisemitism/are-all-jews-zionists/

  • source
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    that's a fun spin on the accepted historical context that zionism was started by nationalists who banded together to get the jews out of their own countries and dump them somewhere nobody cared about. rabbis of the time even rejected the idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    rabbis of the time even rejected the idea.

    They thought Herzl was too radical with his idea of a homeland, as they were then pushing towards assimilation and acceptance within their respective adopted countries in Europe until Hitler came to power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Ok sure I'll bite. How do today's Zionists define said state? Does it include occupied Palestinian territories? Can you see how that might be an issue for the people who are being occupied?

    This is like the "Civil War was fought about states' rights and not slavery" argument. Technically true I guess but states' rights to do WHAT exactly?

    Don't blame the world for conflating Zionism with genocide, when a large enough portion of Israelis support genocide that people like Netanyahu and Smotrich are in positions of power and are publicly calling for genocide on an almost daily basis.

    The genocidal maniacs could, you know, stop genociding and support a two state solution, then maybe the exact definition of Zionism wouldn't be a punchline for the angry goose meme.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -13 points 1 month ago

    Depends of the type of Zionism you ask. Post-Zionism wants a multi-ethnic democratic Israel, Cultural Zionism doesn't want a nation state at all and the contemporary Liberal Zionism is roughly in favor of a two state solution, so a sovereign Palestine state as well as equal rights for Arab citizen in Israel.

    And yes I blame the world for conflating Zionism with the genocidal right-wing politics of the Israeli government because it's simply lazy and not true. There are many historical and contemporary types of Zionism and only Religious and Revisionist Zionism are what Israels government is currently pushing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 96 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

    Then don't be that guy. You're quoting a Zionist source that is desperately trying to redefine Zionism in real time. Zionism is colonizing Palestinian land and building that joke of a country on top of it. Zionism is a colonization project.

    (And no, all Jews are not Zionists, but the Zionists are very happy to try and conflate the two as much as possible.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Easy, just call the Anne Frank house "Zionist" and devalue whatever the say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Anne Frank is no longer alive and anyone using her name to give themselves unearned political legitimacy is a monster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Are you kidding me? The Anne Frank House is a fucking museum in memory of Anne Frank. Your allegations are not only absolutely baseless, but an insult to Anne Franks legacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Museums aren’t typically in the business of current politics, but this one is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Huh? Have you read the news in the last couple years?

    Saying that museums aren't in the business of current politics is somewhat naive.

    At a minimum, current politics is crashing into the museum's business every other week. Most obvious recent example is Trump vs the Smithsonian.

    But it's by no means the only recent case of politicians trying their hand at historical revisionism, or making partisan issues out of science.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    Equating "the desire for a jewish colonial ethnostate in the middle east as part of and supported by a Christian nationalist attempt to fulfill misinterpreted prophecy about the end times" to "a people culturally connected to and practicing a 5000 year old Semitic religion" is antisemitism because it equates the brutalities of colonialism and genocide with Judaism as a whole and puts innocent Jewish people in harms way who have no desire to create a jewish colonial ethnostate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    What's about the Jewish people that have a desire to create a Jewish state that's not colonial and/or genocidal? Because those are Zionists too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They need to accept something every other group of people realized long ago: when assholes steal your word, you need a new word, otherwise you'll be associated with assholes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Where? Mars?

    There's already people everywhere, they can't just designate some patch of land and say "Jews only!" without either physically removing or exterminating the people already living there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Jewish people have lived in the levante for literal centuries and were displaced as well. In recent history the part of land which is now Israel was under British mandate for the longest time. I don't want to say that Palestinians have no right to claim that land but Jewish people have at least an equivalent right to claim the same land. That's basically the whole conflict. Therefore we need a two state solution or a one state solution in the sense that Palestinians and Jewish people can peacefully live together. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_and_Judaism_in_the_Land_of_Israel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The Muslims and Christians that live in Palestine are mostly descended from the Jews that lived in the Levant, it's not like literally everyone was expelled. There's a reason Israel doesn't require a DNA test to determine if someone is actually descended from people from the Levant, there's a reason Israel has some of the highest skin cancer rates in the world (on par with other white settler colonies like Australia), and there's a reason they pretended Palestine was "a land without a people for a people without a land."

    They're white colonizers stealing land. They don't have any right to take it, they can either become Palestinian or go back to Europe.

    There were people there, and they have a right to the land. Europeans can move there and join a single multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious democracy where Jews live with everyone else. They don't need to steal land from people already living there, they don't get to make a nation where Jews have special rights and everyone else is second class, they don't get to have apartheid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    Anyone who wants to create an ethnostate is de facto bigoted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    So Palestinians too? Or Kurds? What's with Tibetans?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You’re really telling on yourself by putting all 4 of these situations in the category of ethnostate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    You'd have a point if all the other examples you gesture to were also colonizing within the borders of other nations, the Kurds were explicitly screwed over by Sykes-Picot to purposefully set up the middle east for maximum civil unrest following the fall of the ottoman empire, likewise with Palestine, and Tibet is being invaded by Chinese colonists.

    All other examples you've listed don't have a bunch of pasty white New Yorker saying "my ancestors lived here 3000 years ago" and kicking people out of their homes half a globe away.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    "You know, a swastika can also be a symbol of peace in India" says the guy with the shaved head that is constantly defending Hitler.

    Half your comments are mossad talking points. You are literally the bad kind of Zionist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Zionism means the aspiration for a Jewish state.

    Yeah that is before they got their state, how bout now? If that's what it is, why are they still colonising west bank and bombing gaza? This is like arguing for the white guy with a swastika, because they're 100% not use it as a buddhism/hinduism symbol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That's because different types of Zionism define Israel differently. Those right wing maniacs like Netanyahu and Smotrich are Religious and Revisionist Zionists and want the racist ideal of a Greater Israel while other Zionists define the goal of a Jewish state as accomplished when Israel was first founded.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_Zionism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Considering those are the type of zionism that lead the state today, and many people within it believing it, its safe to say none of the other type really exists these day, and even if it were still here, it's very very few and far between to make any distinction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Colonialism is the practice of extending and maintaining political, social, economic, and cultural domination over a territory and its people by another people in pursuit of interests defined in an often distant metropole, who also claim superiority.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonialism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well, guess what. The definition has changed and Zionist now means "people who like Israel killing children". That original definition is the old, inaccurate one now.

    Because words are defined by how they're used, and when self identifying Zionists are using the new definition, and everyone else is using the new definition, your "technically that's incorrect" statement means nothing.

    The meme is using the word Zionist to mean "people who like Israel killing children" and you, me, and everyone else knows it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    No, you can't just change the definition of a word because you're (rightfully so) angry. Especially not a word that's mostly defined by Jewish people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments