you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 76 points 1 month ago* (8 children)

So who is going to jail now? I am sure a company is responsible for its actions, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago*

    I think there is enough here for a judge to order a search warrant. It doesn't mean yet a crime has been committed, but there is enough to start some kind of compelled discovery process to find out what the fuck is going on.

    Since it's an important enough corporation that got caught, in a sane society it should not make a difference, but we low key have a two-tiered justice system from the looks of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The government can choose to sue (civil) or prosecute individuals/executives (criminal liability).

    Assuming there is some legitimate explanation (I'll be interested in hearing this one!) they likely won't, but will now establish higher level reporting channels with OpenAI and Anthropic, and perhaps check their important email boxes more often regardless. ;-)

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 12 points 1 month ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Its easy. There are laws against hacking. If you used a script its still you who go in jail. If you used an Ai its still you who go to jail.

    Do not let them try to spin this into the autonomy narrative.

    Someone set up the agent, somebody gave it the prompt that caused this to happen. Some one did not do their job properly.

    Ai agents are not independent actors, they are tools.

    If I missmanage a forklift, I am held responsible. Breaks failed? I failed to do the right maintenance. Load fell down? I did not secure it right.

    This is not some impossible gordian knot to solve...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)