Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think having kids as a retirement plan is pretty selfish. I would rather save money so that when I'm old I can afford proper assistance. This of course is not a valid option everywhere but where I live nursing homes are good and affordable and euthanasia is legal.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I think the problem is that there might not be people to staff those nursing homes.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 year ago

No, staffing will not be a problem. Those jobs are fairly easy to access (you only need some courses and certification), are not dangerous or highly stressful, and will not be replaced by AI or automation. Worst case scenario we will import nurses from developing countries. The only issue can be founding but in countries with stable social security retirements will cover most of the cost. If you're living in country with weak social security you will be fucked and kids may be necessary.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent