335
KDE is actively proposing a Pro-AI contribution policy, with most rejecting any suggestions for AI use to be disclosed, or any consideration for environmental concerns (invent.kde.org)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
😭 2
 

Direct link to the LLM Policy Discussion: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/work_items/187

Example of KDE dev rejecting environmental consideration:

Example of KDE devs not wanting to require LLM use be disclosed.

And all of this is coming right after the debacle with an AI slop project being allowed to give a presentation at Akademy, and the person asking how this was allowed being blocked by KDE:

https://lemmy.nz/post/42029517

as well as the discussion thread bringing up legitimate concerns about AI usage being closed:

https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333/164

As someone who genuinely loves KDE, and has even donated to the project multiple times, I sadly have to accept that the majority of KDE have hopped onto the Pro-AI train, and they will not be dissuaded otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

I'm personally trying to switch to NetBSD. But, it's not going well. My laptop can't right-click in X under NetBSD, e.g.

A lot of the ecosystems I used to enjoy and support, I simply can't anymore. Firefox, Linux, GHC, Debian, KDE, etc., etc. It's a distressing time for me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago

    Can relate, everything I used to think of as a safe haven, a return to 90's style computing, is seemingly being corrupted, and the few remaining options we have require a rather big sacrifice in usability.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent