105
Some are still good though. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/Risa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I think the modern writers have forgotten that some of those gimmick episodes of TOS happened because they had a shoestring budget and had to reuse whatever cowboy or city set was available.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

I can't say. I watched Enterprise well after it's air date and only because I try to be a completionist. I like to think it gives me some level of clarity in my critiques of the show. I'm not as biased by nostalgia for it's predecessors. Though there's a fine line between a gimmick and a show's stated premise. The show's premise was a prequel. It ventured into gimmicks when it started doing three part episodes to try to speed run the premise that it ran away from with the temporal cold war. A few novelty episodes a season isn't a bad thing but when it becomes 70% of your show I think you have a problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Ahh so it's the reliance on gimmick episodes that you think is the real problem, not just the frequency of them. If that's the case, I'd have to actually go back and check ENT and VOY for this, because serialized episodes tend to rely on some kind of gimmick, especially in Star Trek where we often need a sci-fi whatzit to create an issue for the crew. I actually am curious if VOY had more gimmick episodes than ENT then, since it was far less interested in episodic storytelling overall, even if they did apply it sometimes. But then again, ENT was more reliant on "Star Trek" as an IP to exist, which got way more fanservicey than even the contrived Romulan, Klingon, and Ferengi episodes in VOY (but then "Regeneration," is one of its stronger episodes for exactly that reason).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I think “gimmick” has become the colloquialism that is used to describe this season. It may not be the most accurate. To me, a gimmick episode is like “Badda-Bing, Badda-Bang,” the heist episode of DS9, or “Qpid,” the Robin Hood episode of TNG. They happen, they’re fun. They’re episodes where the series steps away from its normal tone and genre voice to have a little laugh. They aren’t every episode.

    Time travel, MU episodes, and reality warping don’t make it a gimmick episode. It's when you can tell it's writing to be reminiscent of something else entirely for the whole episode. The problem is that the gimmick episodes don’t usually have as much substance. I really liked the soap opera episode because, at the end, we got to see Pike go to therapy and mourn his daughter. How much heavier could that have been if it was just a situation where thoughts were being manifested into reality with everyone on the ship being 'haunted' by the emotions that they're ignoring? To be fair though, DS9 did that with "If Wishes Were Horses."

    This did happened in the horror episode that was trying to be Event Horizon and it didn't resolve anything. So maybe the issue isn't the gimmicks, Maybe it's just that they're laying the gimmicks on too thick and more often than not using them to try to hide some writing issues.

    Stepping out of the show’s genre is fun, but it weakens the message (or it hides the fact that there isn’t one).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent