you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 60 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    jesus the video over two hours long, who has the time for that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Fun fact: the human brain can process speech considerably faster than the human vocalization systems can form it, so you can probably watch most videos on 1.25-1.75 speed wothout missing much, it just takes some adjustment.

    At this point I cant watch people talking at a camera on anything slower than 1.5, because thats just the default videos play in (changed a setting on freetube and now cant stand slow), but I have watched 6+ hour videos that way. It cuts a substantial amount of time, and the speed up helps keep me engaged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    A movie is two hours of entertainment, this is two hours of a person talking about tv's podcast style without a story. Big difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Just don't watch it. Nobody is forcing you to watch it. But bragging about keeping yourself ignorant solely because you are too lazy to sit and consume media longer than tiktok videos is not a good look for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Bruh, nobody here is bragging. We're simply agreeing that watching one guy talk to a camera for two hours is about as entertaining as watching paint dry. I sat down and binge watched six movies the other day so no, staying engaged with content longer than a tiktok isn't my issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)