▲ 501 ▼ Parking garage in Stockholm using floor numbers as artwork in an interesting way. (lemmy.zip) submitted 2 months ago by stoy@lemmy.zip to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world 42 comments fedilink hide all child comments emoji 2
[–] jwt@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (12 children) Not if you look outside from within the building. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 7 points 2 months ago (7 children) .. They're symmetrical, they look the same from both directions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 4 points 2 months ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] jwt@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the numbers individually. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) Oh, very interesting point. Either way some of them are backwards which is a shame for a cool design idea like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children) Yeah cool design nevertheless. Found some pictures from within, they picked one of the 'wrong' floors for those shots, hehe: https://www.sosbrutalism.org/cms/18741632 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 7 points 2 months ago (7 children) .. They're symmetrical, they look the same from both directions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 4 points 2 months ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] jwt@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the numbers individually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 4 points 2 months ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 4 points 2 months ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jwt@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the numbers individually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) Oh, very interesting point. Either way some of them are backwards which is a shame for a cool design idea like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children) Yeah cool design nevertheless. Found some pictures from within, they picked one of the 'wrong' floors for those shots, hehe: https://www.sosbrutalism.org/cms/18741632 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children) Yeah cool design nevertheless. Found some pictures from within, they picked one of the 'wrong' floors for those shots, hehe: https://www.sosbrutalism.org/cms/18741632 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent