170
US judge ruled AI-generated child sexual abuse material is protected by First Amendment. (reason.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1368970/judge-ruled-ai-generated-child-sex-abuse-material-is-protected-by-first-amendment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

would open up anything and everything the authorities dislike to being forbidden.

No it wouldn't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    That is what I read anyway. pedo in chief would presumably quash republican support for a new law, but really with all the dems they could get enough pubs to go along, maybe not to override a veto but enough to force the old baby raper in chief to publicly refuse to sign a law everyone supports, (assuming it's not a freedom stealing bill, which it absolutely would be now that I think about it.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent