▲ 475 ▼ Sony, Warner sue Anthropic, alleging "blatant theft" of intellectual property (www.axios.com) submitted 2 months ago by cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 16 points 2 months ago (3 children) I love intellectual property theft. permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sixdripb@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Mind to explain why? Are you implying everything should be CC0? Are you saying what AI companies are doing is good? Should one license their software as CC0 instead of GPL? (sry, I’m not fully versed in the IP apparatus, so pls ignore my comment if I sound dumb. I will do some more research on it anyway at some point) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) I think IP law shouldn't exist, because it assumes that ideas can be owned and leads to predictably absurd results. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sixdripb@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) can they though? Isn’t the purpose of copyright mainly to manage industries e.g. avoid that one actor passes off their work as someone else’s? And they need to have a expiration date. That’s how I understood it. I can see how it can turn in to a cluster fire easy though, you’re right permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sixdripb@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Mind to explain why? Are you implying everything should be CC0? Are you saying what AI companies are doing is good? Should one license their software as CC0 instead of GPL? (sry, I’m not fully versed in the IP apparatus, so pls ignore my comment if I sound dumb. I will do some more research on it anyway at some point) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) I think IP law shouldn't exist, because it assumes that ideas can be owned and leads to predictably absurd results. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sixdripb@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) can they though? Isn’t the purpose of copyright mainly to manage industries e.g. avoid that one actor passes off their work as someone else’s? And they need to have a expiration date. That’s how I understood it. I can see how it can turn in to a cluster fire easy though, you’re right permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) I think IP law shouldn't exist, because it assumes that ideas can be owned and leads to predictably absurd results. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sixdripb@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) can they though? Isn’t the purpose of copyright mainly to manage industries e.g. avoid that one actor passes off their work as someone else’s? And they need to have a expiration date. That’s how I understood it. I can see how it can turn in to a cluster fire easy though, you’re right permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sixdripb@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) can they though? Isn’t the purpose of copyright mainly to manage industries e.g. avoid that one actor passes off their work as someone else’s? And they need to have a expiration date. That’s how I understood it. I can see how it can turn in to a cluster fire easy though, you’re right permalink fedilink source parent