you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

the only problem I see with that theory is that the employee count reduction might let them go below legal limits requiring more bullshit making it cheaper to pay more for Ai than the people it replaced because you have less regulatory nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Being below a certain employee count reduces worker protections

    It does not change the cost of the slop (which is currently artificially tiny)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    do some of those protections not involve expensive machinery (like sawstop saws)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Wouldn’t something like that be machinery the saw company already owns?

    Does slop not involve expensive machinery?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments